U.S. President Donald Trump told Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last year that he had “no cards” in the fight against Russia. But since the meeting, Ukraine has shown it can take the war to Russia.
Putins comments to reporters said two weeks, the intercepted plans lay out a two week strategy those are estimates.
You get that attrition is the dumbest possible thing to use a strategy when you start a surprise war with an overwhelming disparity of force right? Like choosing the way most wars are lost as a strategy reenforces the fact they’re quagmired.
Again you miss the point, a group of grown men shouldn’t not lose slower they should have already won and handily at that.
he spent more than two hours with Khan discussing the minutiae of Moscow and Islamabad’s bilateral relations. Putin came across as “chilled” during the talks, said a source close to Khan. Afterwards, he invited his guest to stay for an unscheduled, lavish Kremlin lunch. At one point, Khan asked about the elephant in the room: the war that Putin had unleashed a few hours earlier.
“Don’t worry about that,” Putin told him. “It’ll be over in a few weeks.”
It’s intentional, their source is a third party source reporting on a second hand source of a closed meeting that literally cannot be verified because it’s closed door.
Add to that their source is an entertainment network who in court said they are not a news source, that they do not provide news only entertainment.
It’s harassing them with a source only mildly more trustworthy then their own.
So did I genius. What you gave is hearsay. What I asked for is a primary source of Putin or any other Russian official saying something of the sort on record. It doesn’t exist because the whole story is made up for gullible simpletons such as yourself.
Dumb dumb your fox link is an entertainment networks correspondent reporting on a closed door session via third party anonymous source. Get a fuckin clue dumb dumb.
No it’s not. There’s no primary source because it’s a closed door meeting ie. Not public and no notes, your source says it’s second hand so why are you arguing it isn’t.
Putins comments to reporters said two weeks, the intercepted plans lay out a two week strategy those are estimates.
You get that attrition is the dumbest possible thing to use a strategy when you start a surprise war with an overwhelming disparity of force right? Like choosing the way most wars are lost as a strategy reenforces the fact they’re quagmired.
Again you miss the point, a group of grown men shouldn’t not lose slower they should have already won and handily at that.
provide a source for Putin saying that to reporters dumbo
Oh you’re hilarious.
we’re still waiting for a direct source dumbo
You think you’re multiple people now? That kinda explains some things.
I think I want whatever drugs you’re on kiddo, cause you must be high as a kite.
Infantilizing and random consumption based bigotry, neat.
it really is kiddo
the fuck you on about fuckface? where’s the source? or do you like get off spewing bullshit online? nasty ass bih
How eloquent. Read the fucking sentence dipshit it ain’t in fuckin code.
u mad bro?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2026/feb/20/a-war-foretold-cia-mi6-putin-ukraine-plans-russia
This is literally someone told that someone else told them something that the third person say to the other person…
This is only trustworthy because you trust The Guardian.
It’s intentional, their source is a third party source reporting on a second hand source of a closed meeting that literally cannot be verified because it’s closed door.
Add to that their source is an entertainment network who in court said they are not a news source, that they do not provide news only entertainment.
It’s harassing them with a source only mildly more trustworthy then their own.
Okay… you do you.
I planned on it.
Oh so your source is trust me bro. Here, I can do that too. Here’s a source confirming that you regularly shit your pants in public.
I gave a source genius.
So did I genius. What you gave is hearsay. What I asked for is a primary source of Putin or any other Russian official saying something of the sort on record. It doesn’t exist because the whole story is made up for gullible simpletons such as yourself.
Dumb dumb your fox link is an entertainment networks correspondent reporting on a closed door session via third party anonymous source. Get a fuckin clue dumb dumb.
It’s the literal primary source for the interview chud.
No it’s not. There’s no primary source because it’s a closed door meeting ie. Not public and no notes, your source says it’s second hand so why are you arguing it isn’t.
Which time, he says a few weeks at the start and he’s said it’s coming to a close about as often as trump says Iran has been defeated.
It’s amazing how you’re too dumb understand what it means to provide a direct source.
That’s a fun non answer, so again. Which time.
still waiting for the source for your fantastical claim
Also, in breaking news, an anonymous source has informed me that [email protected] regularly shits his pants in public.
Looks like the CIA-bot malfunctioned when you provided an actual source that contradicts their claim :^)
It’s already been provided, use your fuckin eyes comrade ain’t read good and stuff.
You’ve provided no such thing. Go read up on what a primary source is instead of making a clown of yourself in public. This is frankly pathetic.
It’s the only link I’ve provided it ain’t difficult to see the blue link babu.