• Flying SquidM
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      Once again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.

      • diprount_tomato
        link
        English
        -11 year ago

        Unlike “Why weed should be legal”, a news article cited in this same post

        • Flying SquidM
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          I did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn’t relevant.

          Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              English
              31 year ago

              You could, but that would be another bit of dishonesty because I have not tied you to anything. So now you have shown yourself to be a throughly dishonest person.

              • diprount_tomato
                link
                English
                -21 year ago

                You have definitely tied me to dishonesty for citing a source you didn’t like despite it describing the symptoms of drug withdrawal in marijuana users

                • Flying SquidM
                  link
                  English
                  41 year ago

                  Yes, I have tied you to dishonesty. Because you are dishonest since what you did was dishonestly tie me to a post I didn’t make.

                  I never said that you tied me to dishonesty.

                  So now you have proved not only that you are dishonest but that you don’t properly read what I wrote.

                  I think we’re done here. You can have the last word and get your dopamine hit from one last downvote.