• Flying SquidM
    link
    English
    210 months ago

    Once again, not a scientific paper. Also a website with a clear agenda.

    • diprount_tomato
      link
      English
      -110 months ago

      Unlike “Why weed should be legal”, a news article cited in this same post

      • Flying SquidM
        link
        English
        310 months ago

        I did not cite such an article, nor did I refer to it, so that isn’t relevant.

        Tying me to something I had nothing to do with is also very dishonest. Why should I believe anything you have to say after that?

          • Flying SquidM
            link
            English
            310 months ago

            You could, but that would be another bit of dishonesty because I have not tied you to anything. So now you have shown yourself to be a throughly dishonest person.

            • diprount_tomato
              link
              English
              -210 months ago

              You have definitely tied me to dishonesty for citing a source you didn’t like despite it describing the symptoms of drug withdrawal in marijuana users

              • Flying SquidM
                link
                English
                410 months ago

                Yes, I have tied you to dishonesty. Because you are dishonest since what you did was dishonestly tie me to a post I didn’t make.

                I never said that you tied me to dishonesty.

                So now you have proved not only that you are dishonest but that you don’t properly read what I wrote.

                I think we’re done here. You can have the last word and get your dopamine hit from one last downvote.