• postmateDumbass
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    They also don’t look at the last half of the word too closely.

      • postmateDumbass
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Half the Caucasus mountains are in asia.

        What Caucasus are you on about?

        • PapaStevesy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          They mean etymologically. Asians are from Asia, not “Asus”.

          • postmateDumbass
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Then i must point out ‘caucasian’ ends in ‘asian’, as that is where this began.

            • PapaStevesy
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Point away, you completely missed mine. “Caucasian” means “from the Caucasus”, “Asian” means “from Asia”. It’s a coincidence that “Caucasian” has the word “Asian” in it, they’re not from the same root words. Otherwise, either Asia would be called Asus or the Caucasus would be called the Caucasia. Look up the word “etymology”, I don’t think you understand the concept.

              • postmateDumbass
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Well Caucasian wouldnt be nearly as impactful as a word if it weren’t for the USA.

                Most of it’s use comes from the creation of a ‘white race’ for use in politics/law/oppression/dehumanization.

                And when that stuff began, remember the Italians, Irish, and many other now ‘white’ people were not considered ‘white’. So being called European was out. Had to try and find a word that excluded the mediteranian peoples, since the bulk of wealth and power were mainly English, French, Germanic, and Dutch.

                Note: and the people mainly responsible for the caucasian misnomering were not from Scandanavia and had yet to conflate ‘white supremacy’ with Aryans. And thus yet to describe ideal Aryans using Scandanavian features.

                • SlurpingPus
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Wrong again, US boy. ‘Caucasian’ actually included most of Asia, since ‘Mongoloid’ only properly described East-Asians like the Chinese, Mongols, Siberian natives etc. Indians and Arabs (i.e.Aryans) were included in ‘Caucasians’, although the definition was debated.

                  Also, the ‘scientific racism’ theory was thought up at the University of Göttingen in Germany, when the US was just a few years old.

        • SlurpingPus
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          So you’re implying that Middle Persian ‘*Kaf kōf’ is halfway the same as Mycenaean Greek 𐀀𐀯𐀹𐀊 ‘a-si-wi-ja’ or /⁠aswijaː⁠/? Do you have any evidence to support your claim?