Because they’ve made her a distinct target. They attacked her for wearing a borrowed dress to the Met. They’d leap at the opportunity to tear her down if they had any evidence that would survive scrutiny (since they’re already doing it with evidence that doesn’t).
The previous commenter’s question stands, though. Where would she have this mythical money that the current regime couldn’t find?
Why would they care? You’re assuming she’s a threat, she isn’t. Also there’s tonnes of ways to hide money ask any divorced dad lol
Because they’ve made her a distinct target. They attacked her for wearing a borrowed dress to the Met. They’d leap at the opportunity to tear her down if they had any evidence that would survive scrutiny (since they’re already doing it with evidence that doesn’t).