• Skyrmir
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    They could tax insurance sales to high risk or high value properties. They’re the ones that will ultimately be the biggest burden in a fire anyway.

    In reality the costs should fall on the utility companies that likely caused several of the fires. But that would raise prices for everyone.

    • sunbrrnslapper
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It’s tricky because the people who live in high risk areas live there because that is frequently what they can afford. It also means they may not be able to afford the rising costs of insurance. The issue is complex and the reality is that wildfire prevention and mitigation is expensive. We will end up paying one way or another.