Once in a while, the New York Times runs an article that reveals what this media conglomerate really represents. People often call the Times “liberal.” That’s because it seems to oppose some of the most reactionary politicians, like president #45, and gives ample opinion space to diverse voices.
  • @Alteon
    -1•1 year ago

    Yes, I’m literally the person pushing the buttons to drop bombs on people. You got it. Are you literally the guy that’s genociding Uyghurs? You the one with the gun?

    This is entirely pointless. Can’t even discuss an article without immediately devolving to insults and racism. This is why lemmygrad is getting defederated, because of little, racist, pricks like you.

    • 陆船。
      1•1 year ago

      Everyday you wake up and decide to repeat imperial propaganda whose aim is war, you are no different than the people who want the war. What war have these imperial stenographers drummed up support for that wasn’t under false pretenses?

      • @Alteon
        3•1 year ago

        Point to me where exactly I decided to do this. Fucking link it to me. By all means, I’ll wait.

        But you won’t. Because there isn’t. It’s so fucking convenient for you to label me as a supporter of imperialist propoganda because it means you don’t actually have to respond to anything I’ve said.

      • @Alteon
        1•1 year ago

        Oh, so we’re conveniently redefining racism to fit our narratives are we? Racism no longer means the prejudice or discrimination of others anymore?

        So if I called you by any sort of racial slur, that’s not racist anymore? You have any idea how retarded that sounds?

        So your telling me someone can call you a dirty, fucking and as long as they are not “participating in systemic oppression” then they wouldn’t be racist? Ooookay.