I already tried to restate the same example multiple times now, but I can’t see that it has helped your understanding, rather the opposite. IMO it’s very clear that “being excluded” and “being rejected” refer to the same phenomenon, so it feels ironic to read you doubting whether I’m genuine one sentence later.
If you’re genuinely trying to understand my issue with your position, I’d invite you to read through the chain again, and to formulate a clear question that engages with my example instead of asking me to repeat, when you could simply scroll up to see what I’ve previously written.
I’ve restated similar things multiple times to attempt to clarify for you, you find your own words to be so unimportant that you’re not willing to answer basic questions and instead act like this.
This is not at all someone trying to get a better understanding of a thing. This is argumentative and combative. I have no interest in that.
As I just said to someone else:
You seem to be trying to twist this into saying that it’s all right to suppress, even with violence, anyone who says something that you might not like to hear. That’s the polar opposite of tolerance and of everything that Popper was saying.
You don’t get to suppress people just because you think that maybe eventually at some point they might be violent. That would mean killing or suppressing every other human on the planet who doesn’t hold a worldview that matches yours on topics you feel are important. It’s not a sane or rational view to hold.
With you I’ll add that I’m now blocking you. I don’t have the patience to deal with bigots who run this coy trolling game when they find thoughts that don’t match their own hate and can’t handle them.
Likewise, you’ve been acting insufferably - repeating your argument is not an effective way to answer an obvious gap in logic, and then acting like you can’t scroll up five pixels is just wasting everyone’s time.
I sincerely hope you won’t have to live through the kind of world you’re hoping for.
I already tried to restate the same example multiple times now, but I can’t see that it has helped your understanding, rather the opposite. IMO it’s very clear that “being excluded” and “being rejected” refer to the same phenomenon, so it feels ironic to read you doubting whether I’m genuine one sentence later.
If you’re genuinely trying to understand my issue with your position, I’d invite you to read through the chain again, and to formulate a clear question that engages with my example instead of asking me to repeat, when you could simply scroll up to see what I’ve previously written.
I’ve restated similar things multiple times to attempt to clarify for you, you find your own words to be so unimportant that you’re not willing to answer basic questions and instead act like this.
This is not at all someone trying to get a better understanding of a thing. This is argumentative and combative. I have no interest in that.
As I just said to someone else:
You seem to be trying to twist this into saying that it’s all right to suppress, even with violence, anyone who says something that you might not like to hear. That’s the polar opposite of tolerance and of everything that Popper was saying.
You don’t get to suppress people just because you think that maybe eventually at some point they might be violent. That would mean killing or suppressing every other human on the planet who doesn’t hold a worldview that matches yours on topics you feel are important. It’s not a sane or rational view to hold.
With you I’ll add that I’m now blocking you. I don’t have the patience to deal with bigots who run this coy trolling game when they find thoughts that don’t match their own hate and can’t handle them.
Likewise, you’ve been acting insufferably - repeating your argument is not an effective way to answer an obvious gap in logic, and then acting like you can’t scroll up five pixels is just wasting everyone’s time.
I sincerely hope you won’t have to live through the kind of world you’re hoping for.