@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoUltimate engineeringsopuli.xyzimagemessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up11.22Karrow-down110
arrow-up11.21Karrow-down1imageUltimate engineeringsopuli.xyz@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square50fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•1 year agoIt’s very strange engineer, if he doesn’t aware of RJ45 connector form-factors.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoHey I’m not absolving the engineer for not doing basic interference checks but I’m saying it’s also somebody else’s job I’m sure, Cisco’s not a small company.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•1 year agoWhat’s the point of mentioning that it’s someone else job too?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoWhat’s the point of putting it all on the engineer?
minus-squarenapalminjellolinkfedilink1•1 year agoIt literally says “at least you’re not the Cisco design engineer…”
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoAnd? It showcases engineer fault, but how do it shift all blame to him?
It’s very strange engineer, if he doesn’t aware of RJ45 connector form-factors.
Hey I’m not absolving the engineer for not doing basic interference checks but I’m saying it’s also somebody else’s job I’m sure, Cisco’s not a small company.
What’s the point of mentioning that it’s someone else job too?
What’s the point of putting it all on the engineer?
Who’s putting it all on the engineer?
It literally says “at least you’re not the Cisco design engineer…”
And? It showcases engineer fault, but how do it shift all blame to him?