• sobuddywhoneedsyou
          link
          fedilink
          English
          161 year ago

          The case against him is for collusion with foreign forces to undermine national security.

        • sab
          link
          fedilink
          12
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s in the headline: “pro-democracy publisher”.

          He was a newspaper publisher in Hong Kong who refused to get in line. That’s all.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              131 year ago

              Literally ran a newspaper which espoused democracy and independent governance (Hong Kong status quo at the time).

              You might also be interested to learn that democratically elected legislators in Hong Kong were arrested en masse from the floor of their legislative building for the exact same reason. It’s as bad as it sounds.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                Link me that information from any source that actually reports on it fully. I’m just trying to understand what actually happened there.

            • sab
              link
              fedilink
              131 year ago

              He published newspapers. He was a newspaper publisher.

              There’s no free speech in China. Publishing a newspaper that doesn’t follow the line of the Chinese Communist Party is a crime, and after the CCP took control over Hong Kong that applied to him as well.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -5
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You could get arrested (rightfully and not) in most of the world for publishing a myriad of things while still calling yourself “pro democracy” (see jan. 6 protests in the US)

                I just wanted to know what he was actually saying to motivate this arrest…

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    01 year ago

                    But they were “fighting for democracy” too. Give me actual information so I can judge for myself.

                • sab
                  link
                  fedilink
                  9
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The arrest itself was actually “motivated” by what they referred to as unauthorised assembly during the pro-democracy protests. This 73 year old man went somewhere he shouldn’t have, and clearly threatened the mighty CCP enough to warrant 20 months in prison in the process. Additional charges up to life are being stacked on top following from the “security law” meant to silence pro-democracy voices in Hong Kong, but as far as I know these charges have not been made public. His newspaper was published daily though, so the nature of his crime was quite public if you’re really interested.

                  Here’s a BBC story on the history of the newspaper.

                  I’m sorry I couldn’t find anything published by Xinhua News Agency, I have a feeling you might have appreciated that more.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -5
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Still nothing about what prompted the authorities over there to deem it as a national security threat, just vague mentions of a national security law while admitting criticising the government is not actually forbidden if you don’t abuse it. Jan. 6 protesters in the US were “pro-democracy” too, and so are both sides in the ukranian war. What did he actually say in those publications that prompted this arrest?

                    Am I just insane for to know a key fact about it before making my judgement of what happened?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          We will never know the details of the charges, because all the legal proceedings will be secret, which is the standard in China.