ugjka to TechnologyEnglish • edit-21 year agoAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, Judge Says In Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.commessage-square217arrow-up11.41Karrow-down123cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11.39Karrow-down1external-linkAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, Judge Says In Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.comugjka to TechnologyEnglish • edit-21 year agomessage-square217cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareDojanlinkEnglish43•1 year agoWhat if one feeds the entire article into an LLM and has that rephrase it? Is it derivative then?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish43•1 year agoWell you can’t copyright what the AI wrote
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoOnly if you say it was written by an AI, that’s the lesson here.
minus-squareEl BartolinkEnglish5•1 year agoOh shit. I don’t want to be in the shoes of those policymakers that have seriously think about this stuff and its edge cases.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoOther journalists websites do this all the time now, and claim authorship. If they can get away with it, I don’t see why we can’t.
minus-square@surewhynotlemlinkEnglish3•1 year agoOnly if it introduces biases and errors like a normal person would.
minus-squareChozolinkfedilink3•1 year agoThat’s honestly not a bad idea. I might start doing that next time I post a link, myself!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoOnly if you add flying turtles and snarky goblins into the article.
minus-square@Zeth0slinkEnglish2•1 year agoThat’s a normal newspaper’s article. Most articles (non-opinion articles) are rephrasing of press releases from press agencies
What if one feeds the entire article into an LLM and has that rephrase it? Is it derivative then?
Well you can’t copyright what the AI wrote
Only if you say it was written by an AI, that’s the lesson here.
Oh shit. I don’t want to be in the shoes of those policymakers that have seriously think about this stuff and its edge cases.
Other journalists websites do this all the time now, and claim authorship. If they can get away with it, I don’t see why we can’t.
Only if it introduces biases and errors like a normal person would.
That’s honestly not a bad idea. I might start doing that next time I post a link, myself!
Only if you add flying turtles and snarky goblins into the article.
That’s a normal newspaper’s article. Most articles (non-opinion articles) are rephrasing of press releases from press agencies