• Viceversa
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    28 days ago

    What better alternative projection they could use at the time for navigation?

    • Kobibi@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      I don’t know? That’s not what we’re talking about. We’re talking about the UN using it not for navigation in 2026

      • Viceversa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        But at the same time, the use of the Mercator as the standard default map in situations that have nothing to do with ocean navigation for literally hundreds of years

        My question continues that thread.
        And my point (subtle it may be) is that when something is wildly useful, it sticks.
        Despite not being universally good.

        And to change from it you need more than just a slight advantage.
        That’s why the UN didn’t think about changing map projection.

        • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          28 days ago

          If you’re asking me to tell you the best way to navigate 500 years ago, I can’t help you because I’m not a historian. The point is that really has absolutely no bearing on how we should use maps today in the present.

          • Viceversa
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            28 days ago

            And the present doesn’t affect the past.

            • MinnesotaGoddam
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              28 days ago

              from the perspective of an art conservationist i’m not entirely sure i agree.