@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoHot Rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1164arrow-down111
arrow-up1153arrow-down1imageHot Rulelemmy.blahaj.zone@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink16•1 year agoI agree that the person you’re replying to didn’t actually refute OOPs claim, but…uhh…I think A=B does mean that B=A
minus-squareHot SaucermanlinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-21 year agoI guess I should have included an /s I wasn’t trying to refute anything as much as I was shitposting
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•1 year agoI expect you meant that A => B doesn’t imply B => A
minus-squareUriel238 [all pronouns]linkfedilink2•edit-21 year agoThe commutative property of equality is established. You might be thinking of conditionality. Given: If A then B, and B is TRUE we cannot say for certain A is true Lisa doesn’t get dessert if she doesn’t eat her vegetables. Lisa didn’t get dessert Can we asctertain if Lisa ate her vegetables?
A=B does not mean B=A
I agree that the person you’re replying to didn’t actually refute OOPs claim, but…uhh…I think A=B does mean that B=A
It should say A=>B and B=>A of course.
I guess I should have included an /s
I wasn’t trying to refute anything as much as I was shitposting
I expect you meant that A => B doesn’t imply B => A
The commutative property of equality is established. You might be thinking of conditionality.
Given:
If A then B, and
B is TRUE
we cannot say for certain A is true
Lisa doesn’t get dessert if she doesn’t eat her vegetables.
Lisa didn’t get dessert
Can we asctertain if Lisa ate her vegetables?
deleted by creator