In the court battle today, the report said, “The White House singled out six stories published by POLITICO, including a June 2026 article that cited a ‘senior administration official’ who put the odds of the U.S. striking a deal with Iran to end the war at between 80 and 85 percent.” This was characterized as some sort of leak that endangered national security.

However, according to Status, that “senior administration official” was Vance, who was “speaking on a background call with reporters authorized by the White House,” and had been granted anonymity by the press pool.

  • njm1314
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Not a false flag. They’re just lying. Nothing about that statement endangered National Security at all. They’re just straight up lying. They don’t have to do a false flag

    • LilB0kChoy@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      They’re too stupid to understand that, which is actually a good thing. Think of the level of incompetence; to plant details for a story you’re going to then use to bar them and the details you planted don’t even endanger National Security.

      It’s not the idiotic puppet show out front we need to be watching, it’s the people in the shadows pulling the strings.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      No need to play 5D Chess when you can just play Tic-Tac-Toe.

      Especially given that, as the situation in Iran shows, they don’t even have the intellectual capability to play 2D Chess.