The rationale is interesting. I’m glad they kept the logo as it’s recycling ♻️

  • phar
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I welcome the change. PostmarketOS doesn’t really roll off the tongue

    • WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      No, but it was a helluva lot more obvious what it was. I guess I understand their reasoning, but it’s yet another obscure name among the innumerable ones out there already.

      • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Do you really think anyone would see the name “postmarketOS” and right away think this is a Linux distro for phones? Perhaps the “-OS” part gives it away that it’s some kind of OS, but so are a lot of projects that end with “-OS”.

        For example: ReactOS, RedoxOS, ChibiOS, MicroOS, TempleOS. Can you really look at any of these names without knowing beforehand and tell what it is about?

        • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          GrapheneOS doesn’t instill the same view either. I think post market was better fit than this more obscure name.

          • pastermil@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I did not say people immediately get that GrapheneOS is a secure phone OS just from the name. Adding “OS” to its name does not make it less obscure.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 day ago

      What even was the idea behind the original name? Was “Postmarket” meant to evoke aftermarket, as in an OS you install to replace the original OS that came with your device?

      • quill7513@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        1 day ago

        Basically, yes, but also not quite no. Market products offer you an initial baseline experience. Aftermarket products offer you an enhanced “better than the average” experience. Postmarket (or postconsumer) products are a de-growth mechanism by which you extend the life of your initial purchase beyond its planned obsolescence. There used to be a really great paper on creating circular economies that accounted for how in the reduce-reuse-recycle cycle our capitalist society has placed all emphasis on recycle when that’s supposed to be the third order option behind reduce (consumption) and reuse (by extending the life of the products you already own) but I can’t seem to find it anymore, but that paper was where the PostmarketOS name came from