John Deere brags about sabotaging competitors & customers on hot mic - they’re PROUD of it!

  • FlashMobOfOne
    link
    English
    131 year ago

    This is the natural result of what we vote for every two years.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 year ago

      Is it? I don’t remember seeing a guy running for Congress that promised he’d prevent huge corporations from running rough shod over everything.

      People like saying stuff like “just vote better”, but the fact is the vast majority of people that run for any office are pro-big business because that’s their background and the lobbyists give them lots of money to get elected. Where’s the anti-big business guy going to get his money to run? And without money, you sure aren’t winning.

      Through lobbying, corporations have us all by the balls. It doesn’t matter what side of the isle you’re on; both sides have basically been endorsed by big money.

      • @smellythief
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        I don’t remember seeing a guy running for Congress that promised he’d prevent huge corporations from running rough shod over everything.

        What we need is ranked voting so someone like that might have a chance on the ballot.

        • @dx1
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          We need to vote on bills directly, having representatives is stupid.

      • Alex
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Campaign finance reform is necessary to tackle big business interests out for regulatory capture. Shift some of that subsidy into funding campaigns so the little guy stands a chance against them and their billionaire club.

    • @tabular
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      The result of vote is only as good at the voting system used and the people voting. A more representative voting system leads to more public representation in government, which would likely improve the lives of the voters who will vote next time.

      • FlashMobOfOne
        link
        English
        -31 year ago

        You’re much more optimistic than I am.

        • @tabular
          link
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure about that. A party that ‘wins’ under first-past-the-post/winner-take-all is unlikly to change the voting system such that they would be less likely to get into power next time. I have no idea of the path to changing the voting system. I hope intoducing people to other voting systems helps.