Some people out there seem to be confused, but I always vote in every local and every national election for every office and every ballot initiative since I was 18 years old. Some of my greatest civil rights heroes have fought and died so that we can all vote and I honor their memory in the ballot box every single time. 

To some of us, especially those of us like myself who have been scheduling secretaries for US senators, it often seems like a morally reprehensible choice between compromised corporate Democrats and fascist-minded Republicans. Where I live in California, I have the luxury of voting my conscience for president for third-party candidates that better align with my ideas of justice and equality. 

But in any and every contested race, as my mom Mary Morello always said, we have to fight the fascist every which way we can, recognizing that even if there’s but an inch of difference between two candidates, there are a lot of vulnerable people who could be greatly harmed in that inch. So vote your ass off, but don’t just exercise your right to vote. Exercise your right to fight for, organize for, struggle for, and manifest the kind of world you’d like to really see without compromise and without apologies before, during, and after election day. And let’s stop the fascists every which way we can. Power the people.

  • jj4211
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would argue the difference is not some tiny percentage of voters, but his first term had a lot more long term establishment people in it. He fucked off and went golfing and the assortment of people in the administration really set direction. Bad direction, but moderated.

    After his 2020 loss and subsequent sore loser meltdown, anyone vaguely moderate went with the prevailing wisdom that he was out of the picture and abandoned him. Meanwhile just the worst people bet on alignment with him and stood by and crafted a plan and administration for 4 years to be just even worse.

    • ultranaut
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Multiple things contributed to the differences, I am not saying the sole difference comes down to winning or not winning the popular vote. Yes, a major factor in the difference is that 2016 Trump had some establishment folks keeping the train on the tracks to some extent. Do you think they would have felt as free to thwart Trump’s will if there wasn’t the cloud of his split victory over him compared to the scenario where he won a decisive victory that included that popular vote? The zeitgeist would have been totally different, the political capital that Trump had back then would have been much greater. Those establishment folks would have been both less likely to be selected to help run the show and those who were selected would have been less willing and able to act against Trump, corporate America would have been more willing to bend to his will in the way they did after 2024, etc. Everything that results from winning the popular vote is beneficial to Trump, so the simple logic is if you make a choice that contributes to Trump winning the popular vote you are inherently doing something that empowers Trump.