ugjka to TechnologyEnglish • edit-21 year agoAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, Judge Says In Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.commessage-square218arrow-up11.41Karrow-down123cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11.39Karrow-down1external-linkAI-Created Art Isn’t Copyrightable, Judge Says In Ruling That Could Give Hollywood Studios Pausewww.hollywoodreporter.comugjka to TechnologyEnglish • edit-21 year agomessage-square218cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squarePr0phetlinkEnglish2•1 year agoBy that logic, all human art is derivative work achieved via biological means. No artist works in a vacuum. Everything an artist sees subtly influences their style.
By that logic, all human art is derivative work achieved via biological means. No artist works in a vacuum. Everything an artist sees subtly influences their style.
This is why “intelectual property” is such bullshit