My point is that the meme is nonsensical because it depends on “loving” meaning “won’t let animals be collateral damage.” Or since it asks why a god would kill “so much” animals, maybe it has a permissible threshold that isn’t mentioned. Either way, I’m officially past my not-worth-it-anymore threshold on this thread.
Agreed with both of your points above. But I don’t see how that supports your claim that original meme had no point.
My point is that the meme is nonsensical because it depends on “loving” meaning “won’t let animals be collateral damage.” Or since it asks why a god would kill “so much” animals, maybe it has a permissible threshold that isn’t mentioned. Either way, I’m officially past my not-worth-it-anymore threshold on this thread.