Yep. I used the term “roadkill” to describe the nature of the death for these animals. Unintentional deaths.
“Roadkill” is being generous to the state, as it at least implies human involvement in their deaths, when the article makes no mention of anyone - let alone the defendant - causing the deaths of these animals.
I am, indeed, pro-taxidermy. It is much better to look at wild animals from museums than zoos or wildlife parks.
And yet you claim roadkill as a fact:
You just seem to be pro-taxidermy and twist the article to your liking.
He’s offering a deduction.
How else he could come by 78 emus in Australia, you could try to make a better guess.
Yep. I used the term “roadkill” to describe the nature of the death for these animals. Unintentional deaths.
“Roadkill” is being generous to the state, as it at least implies human involvement in their deaths, when the article makes no mention of anyone - let alone the defendant - causing the deaths of these animals.
I am, indeed, pro-taxidermy. It is much better to look at wild animals from museums than zoos or wildlife parks.