You don’t get a pass because your 13 year olds of choice are japanese and drawn characters. It’s creepy as fuck and I am judging you for it.
You don’t get a pass because your 13 year olds of choice are japanese and drawn characters. It’s creepy as fuck and I am judging you for it.
Lol duh. I’m not implying that drawings can become living flesh and Bone beings. I’m stating that when someone makes an extraordinary effort to include sexualized images of young girls in their life and display them for the public, it crosses a pretty obvious line of decency.
Yeah, it may be indecent for you, not for other people.
Also, “decency” is NOT (and should NEVER be) a valid moral or ethical parameter, as it’s something completely subjective and arbitrary. The only objective thing we can measure is damage, and that kind of art doesn’t damage anyone, so just because you don’t like it or you find it gross doesn’t mean is bad, it is even good because is a way for helping people who struggle with pedophilia (that, remember, is NOT the same as pederasty [pedophilia is just attraction, pederasty is actually abusing of children, and most pedophiles aren’t pederasts]) to cope with and liberate their impulses and tension in a harmless, safe and controlled manner.
Sorry fam I guess we’re just not going to agree. I don’t hate you, but according to these children, sexualized images of kids does real harm. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckz65jg4gqzlo
These are just feelings, not fucking real harm