• WabiSabiPapi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    281
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    petitioning for a fucking emoji epitomizes the criticism that social media is a vehicle for diverting action into impotent dialogue.

    since we’re on the subject

    retributive violence against individual actors is not the same as dismantling oppressive systems, and should not eclipse the important work of creating resilient communities and networks of mutual aid to replace those heirarchies.

    • maor@lemmy.org.il
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      I think you took the joke a bit too seriously

      Edit: oh wait wtf I didn’t notice the post body. I agree with you then lol

      • teft@startrek.websitedeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.

      • _stranger_
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 years ago

        Yes, but there’s something to be said about the ouroboros of thought that social media produces.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        It’s funny how reverting to pictograms is being construed as “new”.

    • Wollff@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      retributive violence against individual actors is not the same as dismantling oppressive systems

      My problem is that I only understand one of those things. The other is meaningless hot air, spewed exclusively by intellectual elites who may or may not have any idea of what that is even supposed to mean.

      work of creating resilient communities and networks of mutual aid to replace those heirarchies.

      And that explanation doesn’t tell me anything either. Put up a guillotine. Put the man in. Let the blade fall. I understand that. Create a network of mutual aid to replace hierarchies? Never saw that happen. Never learned about that, or how that is supposed to work. Don’t know what that is supposed to mean, or how that is supposed to play out.

      If you assume anyone knows about any of that, and if you assume that anyone can imagine anything concrete about that, you are out of touch. You are communicating ineffectively. At least to me. And probably to most other people as well.

    • bouh
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      The effect of examples is not to underestimate. That’s how they keep workers in check, and that’s how guillotining a king got 2 centuries of democracy.

      • WabiSabiPapi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        incredibly simplistic perspective, and intellectually dishonest; we traded monarchy for a dictatorship of the capital owning class.

        • bouh
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Yes, and it was a big paradigm shift, from blood linage to money linage.

    • Clent
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      3 years ago

      Bitching about someone else’s efforts is just bitching.

      You offer to no alternative effort.

      If this wasn’t social media, you’d not be saying this for fear of a swift ass whooping.