Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 days agoThe people have spoken ruleimagemessage-square27linkfedilinkarrow-up1355arrow-down115file-textcross-posted to: childfree
arrow-up1340arrow-down1imageThe people have spoken ruleViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square27linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: childfree
minus-squareFunkt4st1clinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 days agoDouble, because if you think of your kid as “a pet” instead of “a future adult that you kind of can only traumatize but otherwise they’ll turn out however they want to turn out”… You definitely shouldnt be having kids.
minus-squarePotato Lover 💾 No brain found@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 days agoI think a “pet” would actually be quite an improvement in many cases.
Double, because if you think of your kid as “a pet” instead of “a future adult that you kind of can only traumatize but otherwise they’ll turn out however they want to turn out”… You definitely shouldnt be having kids.
I think a “pet” would actually be quite an improvement in many cases.