Spread this OC far and wide.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      Seriously. If they want to keep their money, they should be forced to invest it in companies that generate jobs.

        • @Monkeyarson
          link
          41 year ago

          Exactly, look up the broken window fallacy

        • @Kage520
          link
          41 year ago

          Yeah bullshit jobs make me annoyed too. Why can I not pump my own gas in your state? “Oh, those people need jobs.” Okay that makes it more annoying to get gas but okay.

          But there are jobs that need doing! These people could be building solar panels, working at carbon sequestration, or even just staffing childcare which we desperately need. Why are we wasting our workforce in made up jobs when we have work that needs doing?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          I think I understand you’re pro UBI. Just wanted to state that I’m pro UBI too. Especially instead of bullshit jobs.

        • @madcaesar
          link
          21 year ago

          That’s a good point SuckMyWang

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        Isn’t that exactly where most billionaire’s wealth typically is? A lot is in stock of some company they started or invested in.

        You can’t gobble up the excess value created by workers if there are no workers.

        • @WaxedWookie
          link
          31 year ago

          …unless you gobble up your rivals instead, creating a monopoly, shrinking the job pool through consolidation, sweating the remaining employees that are competing for the vanishing opportunities to keep a roof over their heads, causing market failure and generally fucking everyone over.

          This is the strategy adopted by the likes of Bezos, Zuckerberg, the Waltons, and arguably the majority of the biggest drains on our society. Billionaires

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Well yeah, all that consolation and abuse of the working class means more productivity per person, and since we definitely aren’t going to pay them more that means we’re now worth $100 billion versus the measly, honestly embarrassing, ten figures we had a decade ago. Single-digit billions, could you imagine the shame?

            /s but what you describe is honestly seen as a good thing by c-suite sociopaths. The super rich people you mentioned are heroes to them. Such efficient use of capital to create shareholder value!

            • @WaxedWookie
              link
              11 year ago

              And that’s the issue - we’ve structured our economy for the benefit of the owners rather than the contributors. Sociopathic as they are, the C-suite are just doing what they’re motivated (and to a lesser extent legally obligated) to do.

              Change the incentives, change the behaviour, change our society for the better.

    • @scarabic
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      Yep. No pity. There is an upper limit on how much money one person can meaningfully benefit from. And our system creates these insane leaks that pour value into mile-deep, inch-wide holes. It’s honestly a form of waste. Radical capitalists should embrace this idea.