I see a lot of free games on here that are made with AI, and personally i’m not interested in AI generated content. If other people feel the same way, maybe we could start tagging posts accordingly?
I see a lot of free games on here that are made with AI, and personally i’m not interested in AI generated content. If other people feel the same way, maybe we could start tagging posts accordingly?
Been hearing that for years now, how AI is only a few months away from a variety of lofty goals. Funny how that never seems to fully materialize
At this point, it’s already easier to list what DOESN’T contain AI code than what does. It’s only going to get more widespread.
Having a model run a code review isn’t lofty goal, it’s available right now and it’s very good. Anyone who’s done this will agree that it’s a tool to improve the quality of the code.
The only reason not to do it is ideological, and it’s not a hill worth dying on. We already use linters and so on.
100% adoption (the thing we were both referring to until you randomly started talking about something else just now) is a lofty goal yes, one that has been repeated in LLM marketing for years now. Always a few months away.
To address what you randomly just started talking about: Again, we’re on year five of identical testimonials to what you just wrote. Leave us behind if it’s already “very good”. Constant talk of getting left behind but nobody ever actually leaves
Yes, clearly if you don’t keep up with the progress then you won’t know what it is.
The progress of what exactly? How much money companies can waste with zero roi? How have your personal finances been since you have “kept up” with AI? Are you making a thousand times more money now? Ten thousand times more?
Just one more datacenter bro trust me AGI is here bro we just need to ingest a few million more books bro you’ll see bro it’s right there. (heavy /s)
It really is available right now though?
You’re thinking of “built with AI” as in “make a game, bot”, but the reality is “run a full code review” and it’s here right now and it’s very good.
Yet another person trying to tell a senior software engineer they don’t know what they’re talking about. I wish I had a penny…
For starters, AGI - Artificial general intelligence. What we have is not general intelligence. It doesn’t understand a thing. Two. I’ve rejected enough AI written code reviews to know that it is not here right now and can in fact not write good code. It can write code that on the surface performs the task desired at best. And that’s still pushing it and flawed and poorly architected.
I always find it odd when someone needs to state their credentials to give themselves some credibility - it always has the opposite effect.
Agent code reviews find loads of bugs, some security issues, some user facing, dead code etcetera.
Refusing to use that support is an ideological position.