The public option sounds like a step toward universal health care, but it’s really a delay tactic. The latest versions would force public plans to mimic private insurers, while the fight over the arcane details buys the industry another decade or two.

…

The difference between a vampire and a bad health care policy idea is that vampires jump out of their coffins and drink blood at sunset. Undead health care proposals emerge from think tank closets and suck the life out of useful ideas when the sun rises on a national health care debate. As public fury at exploding costs and deadly corporate claims denials boils over into historic Democratic election gains, can someone please find a wooden stake for the public option?

Improved and expanded Medicare for All would give everyone full coverage at much lower cost than the combined private premiums, taxes, and out-of-pocket payments that are eating up family income today. But it violates a cardinal rule of federal politics: never do anything that causes corporations or the ultrawealthy any pain.

Instead, corporate Democrats wanting to be seen “doing something” about the imploding US health care system have long peddled a vague public option notion because it sounds like the marriage of a big noncorporate vision (it’s public!) with competition and freedom of choice (it’s an option!). Liberal nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and pundits revived its rotting corpse in response to pro–Medicare for All candidates’ primary victories and Tuesday night’s stunning results.

It’s a perfect nonsolution to our three-headed crisis of health care cost, access, and quality. Nobody knows what a “public option” is because there’s no common definition and nothing like it has ever been seen in the wild, so it can be anything weaselly politicians want it to be. It needs to be put out of our misery.

…

The worst thing about public optionism is enduring smug lectures that Medicare for All is a political fantasy that could never happen from people promoting a vague, unworkable idea now enjoying its twenty-third year of politically viable nonexistence. Yet The American Prospect casually assumes that a series of essential Medicare for All elements against which the industry will fight like rabid dogs can easily be grafted onto a public option.

Health care is a public good. Pretending that having government act like a health insurance corporation will do anything useful is absurd. Let’s kill this putrefying political monster right now.

  • captainlezbian
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Hell, at that point why compromise.

    Semi related, some states have started mandating hearing be covered by health insurance and it’s something the feds really should have done years ago. It really sucks being a 20 something who needs to scrape together a couple thousand dollars to be able to hear (and thus be more employable)

    • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I used to know a librarian in her 20s who was legally deaf without her hearing aids, but her work insurance wouldn’t cover them so she’d have to go on Medicaid to have them covered and then she could work again. The whole situation is absolutely stupid and needs to be fixed.

      • captainlezbian
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Yeah I’m just hard of hearing, but I’ve often had to just pay out of pocket, and when I can’t afford it I have to use my “hearing ear wife”, especially during the pandemic when everyone was masking up and you couldn’t just pass a piece of paper around.

        Also many states don’t cover hearing aids on medicaid either. But props especially to Arkansas for just being comprehensive in “if it’s health insurance it has to cover hearing aids”, but also Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington for having laws mandating coverage. This needs to be federal though