I didn’t think I’d have to point this out, but this is not Alice Huang, the alleged Chinese spy and Jensen Huang’s, er, love interest (yes they share the same name).

This is a Korean singer called Elliye, the pic is from a 2017 instagram post and is known for the “last thing you see before leaking state secrets” meme.

  • NOT_RICK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’s AI slop, the card on the table is the usual AI gibberish text.

    Edit: it’s a real image from a Korean instagram model’s page, but an AI edit of the image was shared with me yesterday which is why I thought it wasn’t real. Either way, she’s not the honeypot.

      • NOT_RICK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Zoom in on the card. I also checked tineye and it says the oldest match is from summer of 2023

          • NOT_RICK
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            The version my friends sent to me yesterday was definitley edited with AI; in the post you provided the card says Hello Merrymonder which is a Korean fashion brand whereas my copy it’s gibberish. Guess I should have dug further for an original.

            Just curious, what process did you use to turn up her Instagram post?

            • wjrii
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah, I’d say the version you got has been upscaled and had the canvas expanded by AI. I see, for instance, that the can’s size labeling has been changed to the American version, the Hangul below the logo looks wrong, and the “Hello” goes slop at exactly the point where the original picture cuts off.

              What a strange choice to burn tokens on.

              • brucethemoose
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                Some interfaces use fixed aspect ratios, so perhaps the diffusion model automatically outpainted the original image from the bottom to make the edit, even if that wasn’t the intent.

                OP’s image uses the correct aspect ratio though.

        • Avicenna@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I am surprised it got some of the text right it used to be an all around crap for texts. Before that it used to be shadows and before that the fingers. Fucking hell it is going to be indistinguishable from a real photo if it goes like this.

          • ericwdhs@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Well, it’s already easy to make a visually convincing fake photo if you’re motivated to do so. For this picture, some local models do make more convincing text, but if the angle and stylization are still too much, you could also just remove the tell entirely by asking for the napkin to be removed, replaced with another object, or changed to a flat color, floral design, etc. Tells only still exist at the point because the prompter either doesn’t care or doesn’t know.

          • jqubed
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s getting a lot more challenging to tell; certainly not immediately obvious like it used to be

        • brucethemoose
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Hmm. It appears that someone “outpainted” from the bottom. It mangled some of the text too (like the Dr. Pepper can).

          But the source is real. That image you posted is basically a bad photoshop, but OP’s meme appears to use the real source.

            • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              You know what? I’d be willing to concede that point after a second look. But a lot of the text is definitely AI.

              • wjrii
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                2 days ago

                Take a peek at the rest of this thread. There’s a version of the photo that’s been edited with AI, but mostly it’s just JPEG-rot on an English-speaking influencer’s carefully staged pic from 2017 in an upscale Seoul neighborhood.

                  • wjrii
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    People have begun confusing vintage instagram slop with AI slop. Sam and Dario must be very proud.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Either way, she’s not the honeypot.

      She’s not the honeypot, she’s a honeypot.

      • NOT_RICK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have noticed a lot of people on here lately crying wolf suggesting something is AI with no clear justification of why, idk maybe that’s why.

        • brucethemoose
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          It’s because the truth is often nuanced.

          In this case, there are diffusion edited version of the real image (and original meme) floating around, but the source is real. And the edits are pretty close, more akin to a bad photoshop job.