Interesting and quite effective choice to have such dark sides to the photo and a central golden strip. I like the way you can see the detail in the sides if you pay attention. I’m guessing the sky was over-exposed in this photo - did you try extracting a bit more detail from it (e.g. a hint of cloud shapes) as, to me, as the lack of detail feels a bit out of keeping with the rest.
Thanks! I did some minimal digital editing afterwards, but I try not to “cheat” too much when shooting on film.
I have them developed at CameraNu.
They have a service for developing and scanning photos on film, and the actual machine to develop colour film happens to be located at the Eindhoven branch.
So I can bring in a roll and the scans get sent to my email within two hours.
Edit: I’ll upload the original scan when I get home, so you can be the judge as to whether I cheated 😄
Any adjustments that could be made in a darkroom are not cheats to my mind. Perfectly fine! Cropping, straightening, and color/contrast corrections are just what you do by default when setting up an enlarger for printing.
I do try to frame things right in the camera. If I get it right, I try and show off that fact by including the raw edges of the film in the scan or print.
Well, that sort of tidying up is far from cheating (and I think I wrote ambiguously, to say the least, if I ever implied you did). And thank you for the insight into your work.
Interesting and quite effective choice to have such dark sides to the photo and a central golden strip. I like the way you can see the detail in the sides if you pay attention. I’m guessing the sky was over-exposed in this photo - did you try extracting a bit more detail from it (e.g. a hint of cloud shapes) as, to me, as the lack of detail feels a bit out of keeping with the rest.
The sky was indeed quite over-exposed.
I take these photos on film, so the dynamic range is not quite as wide as with digital, and getting the exposure right remains tricky
Ah, I missed that it was actual film - which I think increases my respect for your result, film being much less forgiving!
Out of interest, film you develop yourself, or just an apparently very sympathetic shop?
Thanks! I did some minimal digital editing afterwards, but I try not to “cheat” too much when shooting on film.
I have them developed at CameraNu.
They have a service for developing and scanning photos on film, and the actual machine to develop colour film happens to be located at the Eindhoven branch.
So I can bring in a roll and the scans get sent to my email within two hours.
Edit: I’ll upload the original scan when I get home, so you can be the judge as to whether I cheated 😄
As promised, the original scan.
Basically I cropped and straightened it a little, and did some minor colour correction.
Any adjustments that could be made in a darkroom are not cheats to my mind. Perfectly fine! Cropping, straightening, and color/contrast corrections are just what you do by default when setting up an enlarger for printing.
I do try to frame things right in the camera. If I get it right, I try and show off that fact by including the raw edges of the film in the scan or print.
Well, that sort of tidying up is far from cheating (and I think I wrote ambiguously, to say the least, if I ever implied you did). And thank you for the insight into your work.
Don’t worry, I don’t think you implied anything like that.
It was more to show that I met my own standard for “not cheating”, and that the result is indeed roughly in line with the original shot.
Actually, by my own standard the Schwebebahn picture I posted a few days ago is sort-of a cheat, because it’s a composite of two pictures.