• El Barto
    link
    291 year ago

    That would border too close to government censorship, though. I hate this guy’s posts as mixhtas the next person, but full restriction should apply if he keeps breaching previous agreements only.

    Having said that, I hope he does breach this one.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      511 year ago

      They didn’t let Kevin Mitnick use a computer for years. They can do the same to Trump.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        131 year ago

        When and if he’s convicted.

        If the judge goes to far before he’s convicted the right is going to scream about first amendment rights.

        I’m sure they’re already screaming about it tbh. But they’d have more ammunition if the judge limits him before he’s convicted.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          341 year ago

          I’m tired of this walking on eggshells bullshit. They can scream whatever they like. It’s the judge’s discretion. Their “ammunition” is useless.

          Trump is a danger on social media. He has used it to get his fans to threaten and attack people and foment insurrection. He needs to be banned from using it before he does it again.

          • inquisitor1965
            link
            fedilink
            81 year ago

            I do too, but so many R moves are designed to eventually escalate appeals to the cherry picked SCOTUS. Fucking scum, IMO

        • @AbidanYre
          link
          English
          231 year ago

          They’re going to scream anyway, if they aren’t already. Who gives a shit what they think anymore?

        • @CADmonkey
          link
          91 year ago

          Well we better not hurt the feelings of the people who are perpetuating all of this, that would be mean.

      • pips
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Kevin Mitnick was convicted. Trump is not yet convicted.

    • keeb420
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      if he cant be trusted not to break the law he should be in custody.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      Since he has breached previous agreements already I think we are to the taking away all his electronics step.

      Or we would in a just society.

      • keeb420
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        or maybe he could be held in custody if he cant not break the law. like you or i would be if we were intimidating witnesses and judges.