УНН News of the World ✎ In the Bavarian Alps, preparations are underway to restore the Kehlsteinhaus, built for the Nazi leadership. A 33-year-old man is
suspected of arson.
Yes, there is. And if you cared to do even 30 seconds of research instead of basing everything on a shoddy partial translation from German right-wing tabloid BILD, you’d know there are is now a commission of historians working on a proposal what exactly to do with the ruins.
There’s also nothing preventing them from building an actual, purpose-built museum on the site, or maybe even next to Hilter’s burnt house (which could be preserved in that state, with a sign explaining what happened, why it happened, and why it has not been rebuilt).
So a museum on the history of the Nazi era is waste of money?
That’s actually the position a far right revisionist would take…
Edit: Better article by the BBC at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm74pk1g51nko including this line:
So no, not even taxpayer money (probably insurance) will be spent.
There is a difference between preserving history and rebuilding it.
Yes, there is. And if you cared to do even 30 seconds of research instead of basing everything on a shoddy partial translation from German right-wing tabloid BILD, you’d know there are is now a commission of historians working on a proposal what exactly to do with the ruins.
There’s also nothing preventing them from building an actual, purpose-built museum on the site, or maybe even next to Hilter’s burnt house (which could be preserved in that state, with a sign explaining what happened, why it happened, and why it has not been rebuilt).
Amazing how people reply in a thread that already links the better BBC article and still make it obvious they didn’t care to read any of it.
Yeah, nothing. Except the plan is to restore it.