Just as expensive as flying, except that it takes days of travel time instead of hours. And there are very few stations – some entire states don’t have a single passenger rail station.
Well, yeah. There’s a reason planes got popular in the US, place is fuckin’ huge, takes a while to get anywhere especially thru the mountains. Well, that and our rail service was systematically crippled by a long series of utter fucking bastards so that people had no choice, that contributed too. But hey, it could be worse; we could be stuck with Deutsche Bahn…
(FWIW the only states without are South Dakota and Wyoming last I checked (well and hawaii/alaska), and lets be real the kind of person that would take a train would never want to go to SD/WY. Real pretty scenery - real ugly everything else.)
If you want a real answer, it’s because WY/SD have such a small and low-density population that there’s not really anywhere useful to put a train station. And yeah, obviously in an ideal world it would be better to have them connected with passenger rail for the usual host of very good reasons. But, with the limited resources and the minuscule (but growing!) ridership on Amtrak, it would be a tremendous expenditure to extend coverage and would grant no real benefit to the people living there that isn’t better served with intermittent air travel or their current car-centric infrastructure.
If you want a slightly less real, but possibly more honest, answer: Ew, no, fuckem they can stay put in their racist little shitholes. They wanted this, they can figure out how to cope with the result.
I tried to take an Amtrak from Albuquerque to Denver, a 7ish hour drive. The train is over a day, i think closing in on 2 days. And about 4 times the price of a plane ticket.
Just out of curiosity where about are you taking this? Amtrak in the northeast corridor is a vastly different service from Amtrak in the rest of the country.
And that’s a very short trip. Most people wouldn’t take a plane anyway to go somewhere that’s a 5-hour drive away. So I don’t think that’s very representative of what it would be like for the average person to replace an airline trip with a rail trip.
American passenger trains suck, though.
Just as expensive as flying, except that it takes days of travel time instead of hours. And there are very few stations – some entire states don’t have a single passenger rail station.
Well, yeah. There’s a reason planes got popular in the US, place is fuckin’ huge, takes a while to get anywhere especially thru the mountains. Well, that and our rail service was systematically crippled by a long series of utter fucking bastards so that people had no choice, that contributed too. But hey, it could be worse; we could be stuck with Deutsche Bahn…
(FWIW the only states without are South Dakota and Wyoming last I checked (well and hawaii/alaska), and lets be real the kind of person that would take a train would never want to go to SD/WY. Real pretty scenery - real ugly everything else.)
But people who live in SD/WY might want to go other places?
Do people live there? I think that’s just a legend.
Sure, but do the people in those other places want them there?
Well, North Dakota got a station, and we all know that North Dakota is Worst Dakota.
If you want a real answer, it’s because WY/SD have such a small and low-density population that there’s not really anywhere useful to put a train station. And yeah, obviously in an ideal world it would be better to have them connected with passenger rail for the usual host of very good reasons. But, with the limited resources and the minuscule (but growing!) ridership on Amtrak, it would be a tremendous expenditure to extend coverage and would grant no real benefit to the people living there that isn’t better served with intermittent air travel or their current car-centric infrastructure.
If you want a slightly less real, but possibly more honest, answer: Ew, no, fuckem they can stay put in their racist little shitholes. They wanted this, they can figure out how to cope with the result.
i regularly take an interstate trip on amtrak. $99 round trip, takes 8hrs vs a 5 hour drive.
I tried to take an Amtrak from Albuquerque to Denver, a 7ish hour drive. The train is over a day, i think closing in on 2 days. And about 4 times the price of a plane ticket.
Just out of curiosity where about are you taking this? Amtrak in the northeast corridor is a vastly different service from Amtrak in the rest of the country.
Tbf that’s true of any service. Internet, cellular, interstate, etc. it’s wildly different living in the West before you hit the coast.
texas eagle
Ah, that explains it. You guys are already used to moseying along, so the time the train takes doesn’t bother you.
Still ridiculous that it’s slower than driving.
And that’s a very short trip. Most people wouldn’t take a plane anyway to go somewhere that’s a 5-hour drive away. So I don’t think that’s very representative of what it would be like for the average person to replace an airline trip with a rail trip.
And trains aren’t immune to computer outages either, control rooms are basically all computerised.