• Tabooki2Banned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Hard nope on the biological women part. Simple X-ray proves that falsehood

    • LwL
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      “biological” is poorly defined. As a blanket statement it’s just wrong bc a trans woman that isn’t on hrt and hasn’t had any surgery is still a trans woman, but most of the biological aspects of sex are rooted in hormones, so in many ways a trans person on hrt is closer to their gender biologically than their sex assigned at birth.

      It’s still context dependent which is relevant medically, but the term “biological man/woman” is just kinda useless in the first place bc of this tbh

    • trashgirlfriend
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’ve had a lot of biological sex with your father actually and he disagrees.

    • iuminou@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      define biological woman (ur banned lol so ull just have to read what educated people reply here ig)

      • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        From what I’m gathering from other comments it mostly seems to be a term that intentionally agitates people. People hear it and think chromosomes. Other people say it and mean hormones. Apparently some view “Biologically women” as a hate term.

        The term doesn’t accomplish anything. Transphobes will disagree on a weaker stance anyways so you don’t need to elevate it. Allies will agree with a better articulated version (i.e. 'transmen on HRT have hormones that match a mans hormones".) But if an ally interprets the statement to claim “There is no biological difference between a man and a women” and disagrees based on chromosomes, then they will be banned from communities for transphobia.

        Personally I’m still firmly on team gender != sex, thus claiming someone is or isn’t “Biologically [Gender]” feels like a misuse of the word biology in the same way I would protest the use of “biologically married”. It doesn’t make sense.