I saw some discussion about this elsewhere. Here is how the project describes itself:
OccupySaaS is a protest movement in code: laid-off developers building clean-room, open-source, drop-in replacements for the SaaS giants. First up: ZeroAuthy (Auth0) and SalesCompel (Salesforce).
In 2011, Occupy Wall Street asked who the economy was really working for. In 2026 we’re asking the same question about the cloud. The tools every company runs on are now toll booths — and the people who built them were shown the door.
Two towers occupied.
Identity and CRM: the two subscriptions almost every company pays for and almost nobody loves. ZeroAuthy has shipped its first release candidate, SalesCompel is still early, and both welcome contributors today.
Who’s next?
Every category on this board is a monthly invoice somewhere. The movement picks the next target in public — bring a spec, a use case, or a grudge.



No. Almost all of this response is laughable, and has the same stench as the project. I was polite, I wish well-meaning projects well, and if it weren’t for the absurd evangelism that someone else might trip over and be swayed by, I’d just leave this be.
These are not high-profile developers. We don’t know their energy or their experience. We owe them nothing. And whatever this is
is completely ridiculous.
Take this meandering crap back to the bot and ask it to narrow it in on an actual point. There is no path for Claude to liberate anyone from platform capture. It’s intrinsic to the platform Claude itself. CRM will be free from Salesforce, and we’ll still owe Anthropic for the tokens. Perhaps a noble goal, but there’s no freedom in trading one master for another.