Both introduce the world to youngsters, but with different modes.

  • pizza-bagel
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    Cars 1 and 3 are really good movies and you should watch them if you have not. Cars 3 is my favorite.

    And I don’t even like cars

    • diprount_tomato
      link
      11 year ago

      Bro why is cars 2 so hated? I don’t remember it to be that bad

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        The story in Cars 2 is all over the place and the car universe only makes the whole thing more abstract.

        The story includes car races, terrorism, environmental issues, cold war agents, international stereotypes, hacking, secret world orders formed by victims of production malfunctions, the rejection of old friends and a whole lot of meaningless action and comedy skits.

        And then someone decided to add the queen of England to sum this up as if she even had anything to do with the rest of the story.

        It’s brainstorm of references run wild. Even if you manage to follow along and get all the references, you gotta wonder why anyone wanted you to see this.

        • diprount_tomato
          link
          01 year ago

          And what’s bad about all you said? Crazy movies can be quite nice

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            51 year ago

            It’s just pointless is all.

            Cars 1 had something to say about urbanisation.

            Cars 3 had something to say about getting old and dying.

            Cars 2 had some 3d models doing slapstick comedy action while clinging to references to everything imaginable, but nothing to say.

      • MrScottyTay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s not awful, but it’s still definitely the black sheep. It’s tone is completely different and it also just feels like it’s just the same characters (but kinda flanderisations of them too) rather than a natural progression of where the story should go next. The throughline between 1 and 3 is much more consistent, even more so if you skip 2.

        2 isn’t a bad film, but it’s not a good sequel in my opinion, 3 however is a great sequel and a good ending point.

        • diprount_tomato
          link
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I know it goes from “haha funny race” to “there’s this terrorist here that’s killing cars across the world” but guess what? I love that mission impossible shit

      • pizza-bagel
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        I actually agree with you that the hate is overblown. But in comparison to 1 and 3 it’s definitely not as good. I wouldn’t even say it’s a bad movie, it’s just kinda meh

        • diprount_tomato
          link
          01 year ago

          I really don’t remember 3 to be that good either. Like, it was basically predictable and probably heavily relied on its name to sell