A woman who killed an 87-year-old Broadway vocal coach by pushing her to the ground in New York City pleaded guilty Wednesday and will be sentenced to eight years in prison, the district attorney said.

Lauren Pazienza, now 28, shoved Barbara Maier Gustern to the ground from behind in the Chelsea neighborhood on March 10, 2022, officials said at the time.

    • squiblet
      link
      fedilink
      542 years ago

      She was known as a socialite around NYC, and grew up well-off in Long Island as the daughter of, believe it or not, the owner of the #1 cesspool company. So yes, the killer is fairly affluent.

        • @dessimbelackis
          link
          202 years ago

          She tried to hide out in Long Island with mummy and daddy. They probably should have taught her about consequences and self-control when she was growing up. Affluenza strikes again.

          • @ChicoSuave
            link
            62 years ago

            Figures she’s from Long Island.

        • @dogslayeggs
          link
          32 years ago

          I also read that as a slur and not a literal thing. Is that really what they are still called?

          • @TheKingBee
            link
            22 years ago

            If you have a company that drains cesspools, how else would you be referred to it?

            • @dogslayeggs
              link
              12 years ago

              I meant that I didn’t know we still built/maintained what are still called cesspools. It sounds like a name for something that used to be common but is no longer built because we have modern sewage treatment plants.

      • @Supervisor194
        link
        132 years ago

        So yes, the killer is fairly affluent.

        I read that as “fairly effluent” and I was like “I see what you did there.”

      • @Isthisreddit
        link
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Reminds me of the most accurate definition of “what is wealthy” I ever heard.

        PersonA: “What does being wealthy even mean?”

        PersonB: “It usually means someone has more money than me”

        • squiblet
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It might be “this person has more financial resources than 98% of the population”.

          • @Isthisreddit
            link
            -12 years ago

            No, that’s very specific and you can put an exact number on someone who is in the top 2%

            I’m referring to statements in this thread, where we don’t know shit about this ladies finances, other than her dad has a “successful” business. People making assumptions about her wealth. What does being a “socialite” even mean? She likes going to art galleries and events? Spoiler alert - anyone can do that, don’t assume these are things that cost money (other than what it costs to catch a train/cab/Uber to get there, and possibly price of admission, which might not even be a lot either).

            She’s going to prison for a few years, she clearly ain’t got the resources many people here assume she does.

            • squiblet
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              I’m not sure why you insist on arguing that point. I don’t agree with your logic that she “ain’t” got resources simply because she’s going to prison for murdering someone. Avoiding prison for murder is more of a top .1% kind of thing and nobody has suggested that.

              • @Isthisreddit
                link
                12 years ago

                My problem is with people assuming she is wealthy and what does that even mean, it’s such a relative term. She just looks like a nobody to me who did something bad and will pay the consequences, like most other people. I just don’t understand why people are throwing her into the top 2% of this country based on this headline

            • @Cryophilia
              link
              12 years ago

              What does being a “socialite” even mean?

              What does anything even mean? WHAT EVEN ARE WORDS?

              Relativism is a stupid argument.