It was announced back in June but I haven’t heard anything about it since.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    401 year ago

    Think the Sync dev said he spent 60 hour weeks working about 6 weeks to get Sync for Lemmy up.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -98
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Crazy he’s charging 135$ for his app if that’s all it took to build it. What a scam

      • @UsernameIsTooLon
        link
        English
        23
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well to be fair, he’s been building and updating the app for 10 years now and just porting it over to Lemmy recently if you want to look at it that way. It’s not an entirely new app out of the blue.

      • @WiildFiire
        link
        English
        221 year ago

        People when developers need to pay for their homes and electricity and buy food: this is a fucking scam, absolute bullshit

      • @glockenspiel
        link
        English
        191 year ago

        People deserve to be paid for their labor. This is Lemmy; that’s the default position given our history. There are plenty of free as in beer and speech apps out there if someone doesn’t or can’t pay the price. But software development is hard work, especially if it isn’t a hobby. And a lot of Lemmy apps are hobbyists. That’s the communtiy phase we are in right now. And we are a smaller community, which means fewer paying customers, which means a higher overall cost. LJ can’t throw out an app for $5 and expect a hundred thousand to convert into paying customers off the backs of over a million downloads.

        I’ll never understand this criticism of Sync. I hate subscriptions as much as most people, but with software it sort of makes sense because the work never ends. It isn’t like buying a bookcase or any other static item. And Sync, in this case, isn’t like what companies such as LG are doing where they are intoducing forced subscriptions into static firmware to extract maximum wealth from customers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        For a lifetime ultra experience. I could realistically get a decade out of it. Ad free is way cheaper too

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              81 year ago

              As someone who bought lifetime ultra on sync for reddit the day he announced the shut down it’s a price worth paying. Used the app for almost 10 years and only paid 5 bucks. He wasn’t sure what was going to happen going forward so I gave what I could in return for that service.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            231 year ago

            The one time payment to remove ads costs 17€. It’s not cheap but it’s nowhere near 135€.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -29
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yes ultra. 135$ Canadian. An insane rip off for an app, made to deter you from buying it in favor of the monthly sub

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  191 year ago

                  I mean, yeah, obviously the dev would rather people pay the subscription when some of the Ultra features require server work and/or continued costs (translation, OCR, etc.).

                  Developing Sync is his full time job, which is why it initially shipped without a lifetime tier. People voiced their opinion and the dev listened by adding the lifetime option and the ad free option. If you don’t like the pricing, use a different app. Nobody is forcing you to use Sync. LJ doesn’t owe you the app for free (or any price outside of what he feels is fair).

                • ThenThreeMore
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  131 year ago

                  But you don’t need ultra to have a fully functioning app. If you want to pay nothing you can. If you just want to remove ads forever it’s £17.

                • @scottywh
                  link
                  English
                  51 year ago

                  Ultra is meant to be a premium experience.

                  It replicates an option the dev offered on his reddit app that added extra features.

                  The free app is damn good (especially if you use AdBlock DNS) but it’s almost certainly worth paying the $20 to remove ads permanently.

                  That option was cheaper on the reddit version of his app but it was well worth it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 year ago

              $20 is still pretty cheap for no ads. That’s less than two months of a streaming service

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                101 year ago

                You’re really comparing shit practices by already rich auto manufacturers to one guy who developed a very nice app that has non intrusive ads.

      • ThenThreeMore
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        To get the initial release out. It’s not like there’ll be no more development after that. Plus, there’s the much cheaper price for just add free.

        • Izzy
          link
          English
          81 year ago

          You have ads on Lemmy though. Which is free and open source software whos developers disagree with the idea of an ad driven internet. Paying for it to remove the ads isn’t any better though as you are rewarding this kind of behavior.

          • @kmkz_ninja
            link
            English
            171 year ago

            Rewarding working 60 hours a week of work on a well-built app?

            • Izzy
              link
              English
              21 year ago

              No, putting ads in software to the point that it is annoying enough to pay someone to make them go away. Selling software without this strategy is respectable.

              • @wahming
                link
                English
                141 year ago

                There is ad supported, ad free and premium. Somehow that’s still not enough options for the FOSS extremists.

                • @kmkz_ninja
                  link
                  English
                  71 year ago

                  Basically said what I would have. The app takes work. Work deserves reward. Donations usually aren’t proper reward for work put in. I value the work the dev put in.

                  It isn’t so fucking cynical.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                4
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Using Sync. Not seen a single ad so far.

                I’ll probably pay for it at some point when I have the spare cash, to support a dedicated developer.

          • @applejacks
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            idk why but my version has no ads

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        “if that’s all it took”

        Are you fucking insane? I’ve never worked that hard in my life and likely neither have you

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            We know it took about 360 hours. That’s a shit load of work and it will be a daily job maintaining it. Besides that lifetime price is entirely optional