After breakthrough Gamescom meeting with Phil Spencer.

  • @joe
    link
    English
    241 year ago

    But isn’t the S a lower powered device? Or am I mistaken?

    • @Stovetop
      link
      English
      19
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The original idea mandated by Microsoft was that Xbox games need to support Series S as baseline, and then the Series X version would just be prettier/faster than Series S. But the two versions are expected to have the same features/compatibility.

      Dropping splitscreen support for just the Series S but keeping it on the Series X seems like it might run afoul of Microsoft’s policy in that regard, but I think Microsoft is likely to let it slide given the embarrassment of not having what is likely to be the most popular game of the year on their console at all otherwise.

      • @givesomefucks
        link
        English
        141 year ago

        You act like Larian said fuck it and made this call…

        Microsoft had to be the ones to say this was cool

        • atocci
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          Yeah Phil Spencer gave it the go-ahead. It said it in the article.

        • Kbin_space_program
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          It’s in the article that MS-Xbox gave them the green light. Hell, its even in the summary OP gave.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          I didn’t read it that way. Of course Microsoft made the call to let it happen, but they may have stuck to their guns if this weren’t the biggest game of the year.

      • conciselyverbose
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        The original idea mandated by Microsoft was that Xbox games need to support Series S as baseline, and then the Series X version would just be prettier/faster than Series S.

        If they wanted that they needed to offer CPU parity.

        This is the right call.

    • @CaptPretentious
      link
      English
      15
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It is.
      CPU is only about 200Mhz slower

      • Series X: 3.8 GHz, 3.6 GHz with SMT
      • Series S: 3.6 GHz, 3.4 GHz with SMT

      But there’s much less RAM to work with and it’s slower by a LARGE margin

      • Series X: 10 GB/320-bit & 6 GB/192-bit (16 GB total)
      • Series S: 8 GB/128-bit & 2 GB/32-bit (10 GB total)

      And the GPU used in the S is less than half the power

      • Series X: 52 CUs @ 1.825 GHz, 12.16 TFLOPS
      • Series S: 20 CUs @ 1.565 GHz, 4.01 TFLOPS

      So it’s not just a little weaker, in 2 of the 3 areas (CPU/Memory/GPU) it’s massively cut down.

      • circuitfarmer
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Yeah, having the series S as baseline seems untenable, lest all games get held back on the whole platform.