• Kichae
    link
    fedilink
    1071 year ago

    So, they’d still be wildly profitable, then?

    Huh.

    • Rozaŭtuno
      link
      fedilink
      501 year ago

      ‘Wildly profitable’ would not be enough to them.

      ‘Extremely profitable’ would not be enough to them.

      ‘Insanely profitable’ would not be enough to them.

      Infinite growth is one hell of a drug.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The only time infinite growth would be possible is if we became a space faring species and colonized other planets. That would allow us to continue population growth.

        Outside of that, infinite growth is impossible since there’s only so many people on this planet and even less who can afford their products.

        • @jandar_fett
          link
          21 year ago

          They don’t want infinite population growth. They want infinite growth in their wealth. Big difference. They just need enough uneducated masses to continue bearing the brunt until they Crack the code where they don’t need people anymore.

      • @jandar_fett
        link
        31 year ago

        Capitalism and infinite growth is a microcosm of an organisms drive for infinite growth, which is usually curtailed by all sorts of biological and evolutionsry processes. Like space limitations and scarcity of resources, and I’m trying to figure out what is different between the individuals that form these mega corps and the average organism.

        I dunno. Is this a stupid train of thought?

        • @QuandaleDingle
          link
          11 year ago

          Nah, it’s a intelligently reasonable argument. The world would be saved if we could be rational like this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      Yeah it really drives home just how fucking cooked the situation is.

      Sorry kids the biosphere is fucked and human society is an echo of what it once was but there were some rich people who didn’t want to be slightly less rich than they already were.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      No. Because some companies would make no profit and others would be unaffected. Who’s going to pay more, Shell or novo nordisk? Shell would simply cease to exist