• @Ilovethebomb
    link
    51 year ago

    This is a technology that has been on the horizon for decades, but has only ever been used on a handful of vessels.

    If the benefits are as great as claimed, why isn’t this the standard everywhere?

    • Apathy TreeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Personally I would assume because it’s a pain in the ass to maintain, when fossil fuels are less so and not presently heavily penalized.

      I mean really, wind was the original seafaring option, so we already know it can be harnessed that way, but the current capitalist framework rewards doing things cheap at the expense of the planet.

      Cargo ships use real bad fuels, anything would help, it just needs to be required or cheaper than polluting alternatives.

      • @Ilovethebomb
        link
        11 year ago

        Having technology like this to reduce fuel emissions is a great solution, but the market wouldn’t accept cargo vessels that will show up whenever, depending on on the wind.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Looks like internalized costs for this rather than the externalized costs for fossil fuels. Only regulation can truly fix that.