- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
I checked for posts about this and didn’t see any. Hopefully the cross post works properly.
Archive links: https://ghostarchive.org/archive/hKYX9
I checked for posts about this and didn’t see any. Hopefully the cross post works properly.
Archive links: https://ghostarchive.org/archive/hKYX9
This is a technology that has been on the horizon for decades, but has only ever been used on a handful of vessels.
If the benefits are as great as claimed, why isn’t this the standard everywhere?
Personally I would assume because it’s a pain in the ass to maintain, when fossil fuels are less so and not presently heavily penalized.
I mean really, wind was the original seafaring option, so we already know it can be harnessed that way, but the current capitalist framework rewards doing things cheap at the expense of the planet.
Cargo ships use real bad fuels, anything would help, it just needs to be required or cheaper than polluting alternatives.
Having technology like this to reduce fuel emissions is a great solution, but the market wouldn’t accept cargo vessels that will show up whenever, depending on on the wind.
It’s a supplement, not a replacement, so that’s ok.
Looks like internalized costs for this rather than the externalized costs for fossil fuels. Only regulation can truly fix that.