Tesla is facing issues with the bare metal construction of the Cybertruck, which Elon Musk warned was as tricky to do as making Lego bricks

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    209
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    10 microns is .4 thou, about the width of a cotton fiber. Its possible to machine those tolerances, but very time consuming as machine maintainance steps up. Its also small enough that the thermal expansion of the sheets will be larger than that

    • The Quuuuuill
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1012 years ago

      So basically elon would rather dump money into expensive equipment to improve build quality than do the thing that’s actually needed to improve build quality and pay his workers what their work is worth and make their factory environment safer?

      This is the kind of petty angry bullshit you have to do to be a billionaire. Its not about being smart, it’s about on some level hating everyone that isn’t you

      • @Red_October
        link
        English
        702 years ago

        Making a lot of assumptions about what he’s willing to put into this.

        He’s not going to get fancy expensive new equipment, he’s not going to hire the best machinists, he’s not going to slow the work down to allow that kind of accuracy. He’s going to bluster and shout and make demands without providing any way of actually achieving those demands. That’s what Elon does. He’s not an Engineer, he doesn’t design things, he doesn’t build things, he tells people who actually know what they’re doing to build something. Here, he’s just saying “Do better” without anything more, and expecting that to be enough because he doesn’t actually know shit about dick.

        Frankly the closest I’ve seen to evidence that Elon has ever actually designed anything is the eyesore that is the Cybertruck, because it absolutely looks like something that cretin would draw in crayon and demand be made a reality.

        • The Quuuuuill
          link
          fedilink
          English
          252 years ago

          It’s design demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of what trucks are for. I know people give the CEO of Ford shit for saying hes not worried about the Cybertruck because people who want to do real work wouldn’t take any interest in it, but its true. Trucks all have the shape of bed they do for a reason. Convergent product evolution landed on that as the best shape for a bed for trailer hitches

          • @demlet
            link
            English
            152 years ago

            Actually, anyone else notice how comically small most truck beds are nowadays? So embarrassing.

            • The Quuuuuill
              link
              fedilink
              English
              122 years ago

              Very true, and very annoying. Anytime I see thst all I can think is that its a family sedan for someone not confident enouf in their manhood

              • @demlet
                link
                English
                92 years ago

                Also for shitty drivers. Many people buy large trucks so they don’t have to drive decently.

                • The Quuuuuill
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  72 years ago

                  And then they don’t know where the front end of their vehicle is, making the roads more dangerous for everyone

              • @LifeInOregon
                link
                English
                42 years ago

                I mean… I literally bought a Ford Maverick because it was like a four door family car with the added bonus of a truck bed for many of the purposes I would have wanted a truck for.

                • The Quuuuuill
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  62 years ago

                  Maverick gets a pass for being a small hybrid rather than a gas guzzling 1500 with no torque

      • blargerer
        link
        fedilink
        432 years ago

        You aren’t going to hit that tolerance consistently on an assembly line no matter how much you pay. Can be done by a skilled machinist, but there are too many dynamical variables in an assembly line environment, like the previously mentioned thermal expansion.

          • @Maalus
            link
            English
            172 years ago

            It’s not even about that. You absolutely don’t need those tolerances for a cup holder. An assembly line will fuck it up regardless. You use tolerances like that when needed - in jet engines or turbines. Insisting on those numbers on a car is plain stupid - it isn’t better (other than the ego boosting “my car has high tolerances where nobody cares”) than just doing it like every other manufacturer does it. It’s a waste of money plain and simple.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          132 years ago

          For reference, in working with parts that interface directly with optical components about the tightest I’m ever comfortable specifying at production volumes is 0.05mm and that is for very specific dimensions and not entire parts yet he is demanding 5 times lower tolerances here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        242 years ago

        What I meant is that Elon has set a fairly un-achievable standard, as the sheet metal parts he is talking about will grow and shrink by more than that depending on weather. Additionaly, the small parts can be machined to that tolerance, but only by a skilled machinist and not at assembly line levels.

        • @brygphilomena
          link
          English
          122 years ago

          Besides just thermal expansion, which will totally happen by driving on the road, the rotation of the motors and the use of brakes.

          It will also flex as it hits bumps and takes turns.

          And these will be different metals. With different thicknesses which will expand and contract at different rates.

    • @TenderfootGungi
      link
      English
      56
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Which just shows he has no idea how tolerances work. Small machined parts have different tolerances than large stamped parts. The key is setting the right tolerances for each part, designing the vehicle for desired gaps with those tolerances, and continuous improvement to fix and design out issues.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        372 years ago

        None at all. He also doesn’t understend that the issues tesla has faced are largely due to poor process design rather than automotive design. The plans may call for small gaps ore big gaps, but they certainly don’t call for iconsistent gaps

    • Dr. Dabbles
      link
      English
      102 years ago

      Imagine measuring door panels on a granite block in a climate controlled room, and sending it off to the surface grinder for rework. 🤣 Or sending the frame off to get scraped. Truly, this is the most idiotic idea on the planet and it’s all because he didn’t care about tolerances early on. His self own has turned into whatever the hell this crap was.

    • @coco
      link
      English
      92 years ago

      I can confirm this

      Machinist here.

      .004 ? That is exagerated but .0004 this is insane

      This is not a airplane engine !!!