• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not even saying this is necessarily untrue, but the irony in this article is palpable.

    If commenting on bias in reporting then I can’t help but recall the seminal work on the topic in the West in Manufacturing Consent. , particularly the section of the model on sourcing.

    I mean, how can you read this article about FSB influence and just ignore the sourcing sentence stating:

    US intelligence agencies believe

    Agencies we also know have deceived the public.

    Again, this isn’t unnecessarily untrue, but don’t be blind to the other side of it either.

    Not everyone you disagree with online is a witting/unwitting Russian agent, especially tiny Lemmy communities.

    • @SCB
      link
      21 year ago

      I love that you’ve chosen the “can’t trust the intelligence agencies, only Noam Chomsky” hill to or on, and yet this articles conclusion is just laughably obvious

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        “can’t trust the intelligence agencies, only Noam Chomsky”

        The model isn’t a personal opinion. It was created by Chomsky, yes, and Edward Herman, but it’s just a framework for analyzing media and appeared first in a published work alongside numerous “case studies” featuring a litany of citations detailing not only the stark difference between how our media covers our own actions vs “enemy states” but also how those very own intelligence agencies meddled in multiple other countries, including Vietnam, El Salvador, Nicaragua, and more.

        But I guess when we do it, it’s good and cool.