Many women who work at McMurdo Station, the main United States research base in Antarctica, say the isolated environment and macho culture have allowed sexual harassment and assault to flourish.

The National Science Foundation, the federal agency that oversees the U.S. Antarctic Program, published a report in 2022 in which 59% of women said they’d experienced harassment or assault while on the ice, and 72% of women said such behavior was a problem in Antarctica.

But the problem goes beyond the harassment, The Associated Press found. In reviewing court records and internal communications, and in interviews with more than a dozen current and former employees, the AP uncovered a pattern of women who said their claims of harassment or assault were minimized by their employers, often leading to them or others being put in further danger.

  • @rambaroo
    14•1 year ago

    Future missions should be all-women teams. Problem solved.

    Women eat less, use less oxygen, and weigh less than men. There’s actually no logical reason to send male astronauts anywhere.

    Edit: lol @ the downvotes with zero responses

    • @Gigan
      4•1 year ago

      Nah that’s misandrist bullshit. We’ve done plenty of all-male space missions and they had no issues.

    • @babeuhEnglish
      1•1 year ago

      There are reasons to do that, women and men react differently to long-term microgravity.

      I found this study about the differences (but it’s from 2014, please tell me if you find a more recent one) The Impact of Sex and Gender on Adaptation to Space: Executive Summary.

      TL;DR female astronauts have, according to the study:

      • a higher risk of cancer (a 45-year-old man has a 344-day limit in space versus a 187-day limit for a 45-year-old woman)
      • more orthostatic intolerance
      • more UTIs (which makes sense as women on earth are also more likely to have UTIs)
      • less vision impairment compared to male astronauts (no clinically significant cases of VIIP syndrome)
      • less hearing problems (men show a more rapid decline in the left ear and in general as well, but this is the case on Earth too)


      Keep in mind that this data is not the best because only around 20% of people that had been on the ISS at the time of the study were women and because male astronauts are more likely to come from a military background.

      I personally think this means we should send an equal amount of both sexes (maybe more women as it would help get more data on the differences). Sending all-men or all-women missions sadly won’t fully solve the problem as sexual assault isn’t always between men and women, that said, it is less common so it’s not a bad idea.

      Anyways, more investigation is required. If you find a newer/better study please tell me (or if something I wrote is inaccurate), I don’t want to spread misinformation

    • @Syrc
      -11•1 year ago

      Sure, weight is definitely a more important factor than idk, reaction ability in danger situations or physical resistance to unfriendly environments.

      • Sorrowl
        10•1 year ago

        Yes, it is. On a long mission, even a few kg can have big differences in fuel consumption. Also the mean difference of reaction times between men and women is around 20-30ms, which is miniscule. Idk about the differences in resistance to space, but I highly doubt that men are significantly more resistant than women.

        • @cone_zombie
          2•1 year ago

          Why is 20-30ms “miniscule”, but “a few kgs” compared to the weight of a fucking spacecraft isn’t?

        • KSP Atlas
          1•1 year ago

          I would assume a manned mission would have larger tolerances due to the unpredictability of humans and to ensure their safety

        • @Syrc
          -2•1 year ago

          I’m not saying men are better than women in those aspects. I’m saying a very limited amount of people, both men and women, have the physical and mental fortitude to withstand a space mission, and there is virtually never going to be a situation where two people have the exact same qualifications and weight has to be the “tiebreaker”. It’s pretty much a non-factor.

    • @Rand0mA
      -13•1 year ago

      But are you including or excluding trans on that??

      Mwahahahaah