The National Science Foundation, the federal agency that oversees the U.S. Antarctic Program, published a report in 2022 in which 59% of women said they’d experienced harassment or assault while on the ice, and 72% of women said such behavior was a problem in Antarctica.

But the problem goes beyond the harassment, The Associated Press found. In reviewing court records and internal communications, and in interviews with more than a dozen current and former employees, the AP uncovered a pattern of women who said their claims of harassment or assault were minimized by their employers, often leading to them or others being put in further danger.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -57
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Only possible if you do an all female mission imo.

      All male mission -> they kill each other

      Mixed mission -> they kill the women and probably themselves after

      Edit: Lmao lots of insecure men around here.

          • @babeuh
            link
            English
            11
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I found this study about the differences (but it’s from 2014, please tell me if you find a more recent one) The Impact of Sex and Gender on Adaptation to Space: Executive Summary.

            TL;DR female astronauts have, according to the study:

            • a higher risk of cancer (a 45-year-old man has a 344-day limit in space to be safe versus a 187-day limit for a 45-year-old woman)
            • more orthostatic intolerance
            • more UTIs (which makes sense as women on earth are also more likely to have UTIs)
            • less vision impairment compared to male astronauts (no clinically significant cases of VIIP syndrome)
            • less hearing problems (men show a more rapid decline in the left ear and in general like on Earth)


            Keep in mind that this data is not the best because only around 20% of people that had been on the ISS at the time were women and because male astronauts are more likely to come from a military background.

            • Cosmic Cleric
              link
              English
              41 year ago

              less hearing problems (men show a more rapid decline in the left ear and in general as well)

              Did the study mention why the left ear was more of a problem?

              • @babeuh
                link
                English
                71 year ago

                No, here is the relevant paragraph:

                Hearing sensitivity, when measured at most frequencies, declines much more rapidly in male astronauts than it does in female astronauts. These LSAH derived data represent a wide age range of subjects (i.e., four decades) and show a more rapid decline in hearing in the left ear, for men only. Within the general population, hearing also declines more rapidly in men than in women, due in part to environmental factors or occupational exposure (e.g., construction or factory work). No evidence suggests that the sex-based hearing differences in the astronaut population are related to microgravity exposure, and the small sample size of female astronauts precludes making any definitive conclusions.

                • Cosmic Cleric
                  link
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  Thanks. It’s so weird that it affects the left ear of men more. Love to know what makes the left ear more susceptible to damage than the right.

        • @Emerald
          link
          21 year ago

          Weirdest dysphoria ever

        • @Syrc
          link
          151 year ago

          I’m guessing a crew of people sent on Mars would be slightly more tested than your average man/woman. Even the requirements for Antarctica are probably minimal compared to that.

  • xuxebiko
    link
    fedilink
    1161 year ago

    Buckingham was hired by PAE. Amentum didn’t respond to questions from the AP. Leidos Senior Vice President Melissa Lee Dueñas said it conducts background checks on all its employees.

    “Our stance on sexual harassment or assault couldn’t be more clear: we have zero tolerance for such behavior,” Dueñas said in an email. “Each case is thoroughly investigated.”

    Translates to 1) We thoroughly investigate and hire sexual predators and 2) We say this b.s. to protect our jobs, actually we have zero tolerance for those who complain about sexual harassment.

    The report made it clear that those in charge enable sexual predators.

  • @Ace0fBlades
    link
    941 year ago

    Makes you wonder what challenges women will face in future space exploration missions. Long periods of isolation with groups of coworkers with very little personal space. Not like a belligerent party can be ejected out the airlock (It’'ll probably happen who am I kidding)

    • theodewere
      link
      fedilink
      371 year ago

      there’s no doubt that sexual predation would be a big issue and that women would be the first victims of any violence, but it’s just part of the greater concern over authority in such a small society… who is in charge, how are rules enforced and misbehavior punished… i’m not optimistic that a Mars outpost would be able to survive its own judicial system, for example… or any of the prepper compounds… they’re sort of all guaranteed to descend into really barbaric circumstances socially…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        or any of the prepper compounds

        You wouldn’t want to be stuck for a long time in a society made up exclusively of people with severe anxiety and personal issues who reject society? I can’t imagine why.

        • theodewere
          link
          fedilink
          13
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          i’m pretty sure they’re all guaranteed nightmare scenarios… i think people build them just for the drama… so they’re all drama queens on top of it…

      • @AngryCommieKender
        link
        -13
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not any violence. Men are the vast majority of murder and assault victims in the West, I don’t have data for undeveloped countries. Makes sense when you realize we all had “you never hit a woman” beaten into us. Even criminals would rather harm a man than a woman.

        • @Touching_Grass
          link
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What gender is committing all those assaults though

          • @AngryCommieKender
            link
            31 year ago

            According to the DOJ it’s pretty evenly split with a slight majority of men being the perpetrators

    • @rambaroo
      link
      14
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Future missions should be all-women teams. Problem solved.

      Women eat less, use less oxygen, and weigh less than men. There’s actually no logical reason to send male astronauts anywhere.

      Edit: lol @ the downvotes with zero responses

      • @Gigan
        link
        41 year ago

        Nah that’s misandrist bullshit. We’ve done plenty of all-male space missions and they had no issues.

      • @babeuh
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There are reasons to do that, women and men react differently to long-term microgravity.

        I found this study about the differences (but it’s from 2014, please tell me if you find a more recent one) The Impact of Sex and Gender on Adaptation to Space: Executive Summary.

        TL;DR female astronauts have, according to the study:

        • a higher risk of cancer (a 45-year-old man has a 344-day limit in space versus a 187-day limit for a 45-year-old woman)
        • more orthostatic intolerance
        • more UTIs (which makes sense as women on earth are also more likely to have UTIs)
        • less vision impairment compared to male astronauts (no clinically significant cases of VIIP syndrome)
        • less hearing problems (men show a more rapid decline in the left ear and in general as well, but this is the case on Earth too)


        Keep in mind that this data is not the best because only around 20% of people that had been on the ISS at the time of the study were women and because male astronauts are more likely to come from a military background.

        I personally think this means we should send an equal amount of both sexes (maybe more women as it would help get more data on the differences). Sending all-men or all-women missions sadly won’t fully solve the problem as sexual assault isn’t always between men and women, that said, it is less common so it’s not a bad idea.

        Anyways, more investigation is required. If you find a newer/better study please tell me (or if something I wrote is inaccurate), I don’t want to spread misinformation

      • @Syrc
        link
        -111 year ago

        Sure, weight is definitely a more important factor than idk, reaction ability in danger situations or physical resistance to unfriendly environments.

        • Sorrowl
          link
          fedilink
          101 year ago

          Yes, it is. On a long mission, even a few kg can have big differences in fuel consumption. Also the mean difference of reaction times between men and women is around 20-30ms, which is miniscule. Idk about the differences in resistance to space, but I highly doubt that men are significantly more resistant than women.

          • @cone_zombie
            link
            21 year ago

            Why is 20-30ms “miniscule”, but “a few kgs” compared to the weight of a fucking spacecraft isn’t?

          • KSP Atlas
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            I would assume a manned mission would have larger tolerances due to the unpredictability of humans and to ensure their safety

          • @Syrc
            link
            -2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m not saying men are better than women in those aspects. I’m saying a very limited amount of people, both men and women, have the physical and mental fortitude to withstand a space mission, and there is virtually never going to be a situation where two people have the exact same qualifications and weight has to be the “tiebreaker”. It’s pretty much a non-factor.

      • @Rand0mA
        link
        -131 year ago

        But are you including or excluding trans on that??

        Mwahahahaah

    • @chakan2
      link
      21 year ago

      I have a feeling people picked for those types of missions will be vetted harder than “Hey, want to see some snow”

    • @AngryCommieKender
      link
      -171 year ago

      Just FYI that username may get you some hostility. It’s far too close to Ace of Bass which is a band from the 90s that were neo-nazis. The Base of Aces was a Nazi submarine base in WW2. I’m not assuming anything here, the lead singer and guitarist both confirmed separately that was what their band name was referring to, just before they lost all their fans.

  • @ghostBones
    link
    821 year ago

    I had a female friend/coworker that had previously served in the Navy, on a carrier as a communications specialist. She told stories of endless harassment. She said ultimately some of the women crafted partnerships with other female sailors and convinced everyone they were lesbians in order to just survive the job. It meant they had to spend lots of time together and play the part. She also said they had to work the jealousy angle because nobody wanted to be attacked by an angry lesbian girlfriend.

    The male sailors assumed a lot of the women were lesbians because of the masculine nature of the work, or, as she put it, because they couldn’t believe the women weren’t attracted to them. It turned out if you gave them a plausible explanation you could fake your way through it. Without a plausible explanation, they could become resentful and dangerous. I asked if claiming to be married and/or have kids would work, she said it wasn’t as effective and you ultimately needed female allies anyway. She also said that actual lesbians would pretend to “date” hetero women in order to protect them. She kind of described it as leveraging the power of rumors.

    I told her it sounded a lot like what happens in prison. She said in some ways, it was a prison.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    69
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    One of them carried a hammer held by her bra. Wild. The person in charge of this place should be facing criminal charges.

    • @Skyrmir
      link
      161 year ago

      That’s just stupid, they have ice climbing picks that would hang far more comfortably from a belt. And be easier to reach when needed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    641 year ago

    Yeah, as a woman, I’d be real hesitant about taking a job out there, or any place thats more wild-west in nature (very few people and very lax regulation of any laws) and I’d sure as hell take gun tactical training before going, and always have a firearm on me.

    • ColorcodedResistor
      link
      fedilink
      -118
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But that narrative doesn’t support the anti gun ideology. they want everyone disarmed so the strong can once again shuffle the weak in any direction they choose. it makes them so mad that they have to think twice about sexual assault or else they get blown away. its like a condom, those convincing you that you don’t need one, means you really really need one.

      edit: so mad 😎

      triple digit mad lets fucking Goooooo! 🤣

      Your downvotes mean you like women undefended and unprotected. that’s kinda sorta a bunch fucked up. please find peace in your lives where you aren’t afraid of guns because you just want to rape unopposed.

      what’s the slow down? Let’s hit 4 digi mad!

      • Flying Squid
        link
        181 year ago

        Oh yes, how they shuffle the weak in the UK and Australia. Just weak people being shuffled around by the strong all over the place.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            101 year ago

            I’m really trying to use the UK and Australia as places where people have as much freedom as they do in the US but no guns. Or do you think they’re totalitarian police states or something?

              • Flying Squid
                link
                71 year ago

                Maybe instead of arming women to stop men from raping them, we start teaching our men that masculinity does not equal sex and sex does not equal power?

              • @dangblingus
                link
                21 year ago

                Rape doesn’t occur by strangers. Statistically speaking, it’s a family member raping a family member. Or it’s a close acquaintance. Staying strapped at all times to prevent SA isn’t reasonable.

      • @mojofrododojo
        link
        English
        131 year ago

        Your downvotes mean you like women undefended and unprotected. that’s kinda sorta a bunch fucked up.

        guns are much more likely to be used to commit sexual violence than stop sexual violence. this entire premise is fucked up.

        https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/arms-control/gun-violence/

        https://jaapl.org/content/early/2020/02/05/JAAPL.003929-20

        https://giffords.org/lawcenter/gun-laws/policy-areas/who-can-have-a-gun/domestic-violence-firearms/

        https://www.americanprogress.org/article/guns-and-violence-against-women/

        The impact of gun violence against women goes beyond fatal encounters. A 2016 study found that nearly 1 million women alive at that time had been shot by an intimate partner, and 4.5 million women had been threatened with a firearm.4 Firearms have long been used as a tool of power and control to instill fear and inflict abuse on women—with women of color, people in the LGBTQ community, and women with disabilities being disproportionately affected.5

        https://everytownresearch.org/report/guns-and-violence-against-women-americas-uniquely-lethal-intimate-partner-violence-problem/

        I get that you think you’re some righteous crusader for women’s safety but the more guns solution hasn’t worked - there are more guns than people in the US; how many more guns do we need until you admit your hypothesis is wrong? What’s the number, 500 million?

        20 per person? Keep in mind, the more guns there are in the population, the more domestic abusers will use them to intimidate and violate their victims. So when do we get to safety through guns?

        Make it make sense.

        • @Alexstarfire
          link
          31 year ago

          I’m not surprised by this but it makes me wonder how many women in these instances had a gun on them. Are men more likely to have a gun than the woman? You seem more familiar with the topic than I. Is that stated in any of the articles?

          • @mojofrododojo
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            so if it’s human nature to murder, we should make sure more people have access to easily available tools with which to murder people?

            come on, you’re half way there…

              • @mojofrododojo
                link
                English
                01 year ago

                ignorant fuckwits like you assume people are scared when they disagree with arms being spread amongst the populace.

                Die mad? What’s got your panties in such a bunch lil dude?

                We both live in a world with Australia too. Read some fucking history you bellend.

                And points - big ones - for being so afraid of taking guns back that the solution to the mass murders occurring ALL THE FUCKING TIME NOW is - wait for it - MORE GUNS!

                Goddamn that’s stupid.

          • @uis
            link
            01 year ago

            Uhhh, please clarify. How to make nature kill and why you say you are ill?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              And making his way into the ring, weighing a steady 350 pounds after training on Stardew Valley, vegan Oreos and Mountain Dew, it’s The Agenda Pusher!

              Here to derail any meaningful conversation on any topic and make it all about his pet political issue, he’ll topple you with his signature move, The Forum Slide, where in one post he’ll turn any discussion into a shit-flinging flame war where everyone will forget what they were originally talking about in the first place!

              cue theme music

              cue applause

              • @dangblingus
                link
                -5
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                2A propaganda. “Anti Gun Ideology”? That’s not something being discussed anywhere in the US. There is no anti-gun ideology. Some people just want it to be harder for criminals and mental health patients to acquire full auto rifles. Generally the 2nd amendment chest beaters only come out after mass shootings, of which there were like 3 this past weekend. So while you didn’t mention dead kids, that is the general outcome of Republican obstructionism on all issues related to 2A.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        edit: so mad 😎

        They get mad when reality disagrees with them. Big mad. As in to say most of the time

        • @mojofrododojo
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          they get mad because it’s bullshit. a stupid hypothesis backed by a bunch of fearmongering and frothed spittle.

          riddle me this, gunman: how many guns until we’re ‘safe’?

          we’ve got more guns than people. so what’s it gonna take? 4 per person? 10? Do we need six billion guns so every american can count 20 in their home arsenal? Does that get us to safe?

          pretty fucking stupid premise.

            • @mojofrododojo
              link
              English
              41 year ago

              good question! do you think more firearms would make the rapists less likely to have a gun, or more likely?

              I’ll wait over here while you figure this out.

                • @mojofrododojo
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  aw, got your feelings hurt? poor baby.

                  we’re all gonna die you schmuck, you’re probably just going to go in a ‘cleaning accident’.

      • @zefiax
        link
        -11 year ago

        Your downvotes mean you like women undefended and unprotected. that’s kinda sorta a bunch fucked up. please find peace in your lives where you aren’t afraid of guns because you just want to rape unopposed.

        LOL. no, it doesnt.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -21 year ago

        She specifically said “training”, which on its own immediately goes against whatever insane ideology you’re selling.

  • @AngryCommieKender
    link
    311 year ago

    We’re just ignoring the sign that damn near reads “McMurder Station”?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    231 year ago

    Being alone in the middle of a literal ice desert with a lot of male nerds so socially awkward that they rather be in the middle of an ice desert sounds like an absolute disaster.

  • @30mag
    link
    12
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

  • @4RYAZ
    link
    -131 year ago

    Removed by mod

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1101 year ago

      “Men will be men” just excuses the behaviour and ostracizes men who don’t do these things. It has less to do with their sex and more to do with how we raise men.

      Toxic masculinity as a defence mechanism of patriarchal society is the main problem and “feminine”, “emotional” or “weak” men, or those not subscribing to heteronormative sexuality are targeted by the same types to uphold their status.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        Yup. It boils down to power imbalances that are systemic in a world where men still control almost everything.

        I had always hoped we’d move past this but it seems we may not get the chance now (with climate change raging around us).

        • @NTNU
          link
          161 year ago

          Where some men still control almost everything.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -11 year ago

            Ofc it’s not all men, but it’s enough men that make everyone’s lives harder. So instead of arguing “not all” maybe focus on the some that are the cause of the problem.

            • Nate Cox
              link
              fedilink
              101 year ago

              I feel like the primary complaint here is that the parent commenters very much want to focus on the some that are the cause of the problem, rather than simply stating that men are problematic.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -61 year ago

                Yup. If men as a group policed their own there would be a change. But as it stands they don’t seem to want to do that all the time because it’s easier to just let the bad ones slide through.

                • @Mardukas
                  link
                  41 year ago

                  What’s there to police? It’s not like most aggressors are openly grabbing people in their genitals for all to see. These people know that they are wrong and so they hide it. What am I, as a man against this behaviour, supposed to do about other men?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  If men as a group policed their own there would be a change.

                  This is actually a great idea! To make things simple perhaps we can give these policing men like… some form of identification, like a badge or a uniform so people know who to trust. This is the game changer we needed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Men will be men is for where men do stupid shit like attach a motor to a merry-go-round and see who can sit on it for the longest or dig holes at the beach because hole.

        It’s sad and sickening to see it be used to try and excuse sexual harassment and assault.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        Boys will be boys is something frequently said by mothers. But of course that’s fact doesn’t fit the “patriarchy” narrative.

      • @uis
        link
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        are targeted by the same types to uphold their status.

        Or sometimes targeted by their mothers. At least this happened to me. I had one long fingernail(on middle finger, you guessed why) and my mother complauned about it almost every day to the point where she came to dad and complained to him. He said “why do you even care?”, but she continued anyway saying “this is not how men do”.

        This happened in post-Soviet society where average family with children is mother+grandmother, so it has nothing to do with “patriarchality” of society. I think it is just manifestation of much broader problems: virtual majority and I can’t translate it, but basicaly “you should do it this way because I said so”.

    • El Barto
      link
      551 year ago

      Bro. I’m a man. I have hormones. I also know how to control them.

      “Men will be men” is an unfair generalization.

    • Quaternions
      link
      321 year ago

      I really hate the “men will be men” argument. Real men don’t rape or sexually harass people.

    • xuxebiko
      link
      fedilink
      28
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      men will apparently just be men.

      this thinking removes the sexual harasser’s & rapist’s responsibility for their crimes and moves it to their gender/DNA.

      When criminal conduct is enabled, crime will escalate.

      • DessertStorms
        link
        fedilink
        -16
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And saying not all men gives every man an excuse in their mind as to why they don’t need to do anything about the problem with their peers.

        • xuxebiko
          link
          fedilink
          -81 year ago

          Yes! It absolves men of their responsibility to make their society/community safe and it ensures that if they become a problem then other men will not stop them.