GOP presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy did not back down Sunday when questioned about comments he made during a campaign stop in Iowa Friday, calling Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) part of the “modern KKK.”

“I stand by what I said to provoke an open and honest discussion in this country,” Ramaswamy said during an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

  • @bob_wiley
    link
    English
    72
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      291 year ago

      For one simple and depressing reason - people click on it. That’s the dopamine button for modern media outlets online; those clicks are the cash register ringing.

      If you want to figure out a way to elevate the discourse you have to disrupt the payment model - at the end of the day people do what gets them paid. Doubly so when the harm it causes is anonymized by operating in corporate aggregates.

      • @bob_wiley
        link
        English
        8
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Of course not, that isn’t what I mean. I’m taking about why media in general reports as “straight news” the inflammatory blathering of political figures. Whether you as the reader agree with it or not, these kind of statements in headlines get the publisher clicks.

          Clicks == revenue for for the media site, so they are incentivized to provide more content like that. Politicians need exposure more than just about anything, so they tend more towards that kind of language in part to get greater exposure through those venues.

          I don’t think people posting content like this to aggregators like lemmy are in that incentivizing loop directly, but users engaging with the content even if they hate does incentivize the behavior further(albeit in a very small, incremental way).

      • @TokenBoomer
        link
        21 year ago

        Underrated comment. Can’t upvote more.

    • @qwertyqwertyqwerty
      link
      English
      141 year ago

      I think you answered your own question. He’s playing the Trump bit. Saying extreme things to get news headlines and people talking about him. And it’s working to some extent.

      • @bob_wiley
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        deleted by creator

      • @Ensign_Crab
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        Or worse, they learned that a bigoted blowhard is good for ratings.

      • @MataVatnik
        link
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah I’ll start doing that, and start saying to people that talk about that you don’t care. It’s annoying how predictable we are as humans sometimes

    • @satanmat
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      People and the media didn’t learn from trump that they should not feed the crazy

      • @Fades
        link
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        media didn’t learn

        Oh they learned alright. They do this not because they didn’t learn their lesson but because they did. Actual journalism and reporting is ALWAYS second to shit articles that are wrong in order to be the first one out the door, click bait the article title, showcase the fascists for the rage bait, etc.

        They exist to make money and so the lessons learned revolve solely around finance. Whey would they learn anything else? This shit is working for them