• gabe [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    I’m sorry, but I have difficulty being polite to someone who has actively ignored addressing safety concerns that were brought up months ago. FOSS or not.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -121 year ago

      Stop misconstruing it as safety. It’s about legality. Nobody’s safety is in jeopardy because they saw an illegal image accidentally. This is about following the law, not protecting the safety of users.

      • @toasteecup
        link
        English
        161 year ago

        nobody’s safety is in jeopardy

        You know, except for those abuse victims whose pictures are being spread around lemmy. Just sayin’

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -51 year ago

          I thought it was pretty apparent we were talking about Lemmy, but okay.

          The statements were about the Lemmy devs can and/or should be doing for safety. They simply do not have the power to stop child abuse by developing a social media platform. So then the safety in question must be the safety of people using Lemmy, because the Lemmy devs have some direct power over that.

          I’m sure you feel very morally aloof with your righteous retort, though.

      • gabe [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        111 year ago

        It ties into safety as well, websites have “trust and safety” teams. This is where it falls under. Sorry for not being more concise.