Pope Francis condemned the “very strong, organised, reactionary attitude” in the US church and said Catholic doctrine allows for change over time.

Pope Francis has blasted the “backwardness” of some conservatives in the US Catholic Church, saying they have replaced faith with ideology and that a correct understanding of Catholic doctrine allows for change over time.

Francis’ comments were an acknowledgment of the divisions in the US Catholic Church, which has been split between progressives and conservatives who long found support in the doctrinaire papacies of St John Paul II and Benedict XVI, particularly on issues of abortion and same-sex marriage.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    EDIT: Do I really have to say that I’m not a Christian before arguing from their point. Didn’t you muppets notice the blasphemy I added?


    If God is all powerful how come he leaves his messages to interpretation.

    So that humanity can learn:

    Shouldn’t we all just be born knowing the exact wording and understanding?

    Then we’d be mindless puppets without free will. The guy, however, doesn’t want to be admired by automatons but people who could decide otherwise.

    It’s the ole “if you slip your crush a love potion, is it actually love” problem and, indeed, no, it’s rape.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      What if you tell your crush they need to love you or you will throw them in a lake of fire to suffer for eternity while you enjoy sniffing the smoke?

      That seems abusive. And maybe somewhat unhinged.

      • Queen HawlSera
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Actually Hell is only a lake of fire on pop culture. In theology it is a state of depression persisting throughout the afterlife brought on by seperation from the divine.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I really don’t want to play Christian apologetics here, yes the whole thing is unhinged, and no I’m not even a Christian, this is all just comparative mysticism for me and I like The Sandman much better.

        But specifically as to the hell thing the doctrine of denominations differ, e.g. Lutherans think that faith is not required before you have proof, that is, until you’re standing at the crossroads of afterlife, heaven on one side and hell on the other. Capability to tell the both apart is something you probably should have taken some time to learn on earth, though.

        It is possible to make Christianity make sense if, and only if, you interpret things just right. And it will put you at loggerheads with practically all Christians. Been there, done that, either they fall silent or they unleash the full force of their neuroses to ignore you, little in between.

        And, of course, originally hell didn’t even exist it was a question of oblivion vs. spend the afterlife in the radiance of god’s presence. Not sure exactly where in the transformation from Judaism to Christianity that one happened but at the very least the vast majority of stuff about hell is bible fan-fiction.

    • @Redditiscancer789
      link
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lol how does having that knowledge untainted message take away free will? To your example if someone doesn’t know rape is illegal that doesn’t mean it’s a free pass if they rape someone and vice versa just because people know rape is illegal doesn’t mean there aren’t people raping other people out there.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Because knowledge is proof and in Christian understanding that would zonk your mind due to god’s purported properties. Think of it like the ultimate high-ball, you’d instantly become a junkie.

        • @Redditiscancer789
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          What are you even saying? Just a long winded way to say “durrr you no comprehend God’s will cause you silly stupid hoomen”

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            I mean there’s a lot of things I don’t understand, and don’t think I can possibly understand, that are way smaller than how Christians describe god.

            They understand it more like a consequence of physics, as a logically necessary property. Like a fat man jumping on a trampoline full of kids, sure they’re still going to bounce but it won’t be their bouncing, any more.

            • @Redditiscancer789
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              Which is my point, their god if they exist clearly isn’t omnipotent, otherwise the dude could do anything from turning the frequency down to something us wittle itty bitty silly hoomens could understand or vice versa increase our mental aptitude and make us ‘smarter’.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                11 year ago

                I mean he did by sending a less fat guy down (the one who got nailed to the cross). But jumping on a trampoline with Jesus doesn’t constitute proof of the whole trinity shebang.

                And yes the whole omnipotence thing breaks down as soon as you try to break logic with it. The Stoic take on that stuff makes a lot more sense: The gods are benevolent and the hardness we suffer is a product of their non-omnipotence, however they gave us that divine spark – reason and wisdom – to be able to get on top of things. They furnished the world to be as perfect as they could, the rest is up to us. Of course for the Stoics philosophy comes first, religion is simply some mythology to tack on afterwards.

                • @Redditiscancer789
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  I mean yes that idea has been in many religions since we were shitting on the grass living in huts. Greek mythology, Aztec mythology, Chinese mythology, Japanese mythology all follow similar lines of thought where you try to gain the attention of what ever god you’re seeking favor from by doing X thing(s)(sacrifice of some sort, leave food/drink as offering, slaughtering other gods followers). But even that doesn’t prove anything especially if they were truly benevolent why wouldn’t they reveal themselves? And not just through a human but ACTUALLY reveal themselves.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    1
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    But even that doesn’t prove anything especially if they were truly benevolent why wouldn’t they reveal themselves?

                    Pagan gods do? I mean it’s all biology/psychology but with plurality still intact instincts can self-portrait as archetypes, thereby more strongly influencing adaptation, seen either in dreams, visions, or projected out onto the world, also other people. The difference to ancestral cults (correctly understood) is merely sorting genetic knowledge (or better put expectations of the world) into categories so it’s easier to spot. Read Freud for the basal instincts, Adler for the social ones, Jung for the actualising ones. Also, Panksepp.

                    Also, Thor exists. Proof: Christian churches have lightning rods.

                    Oh, thinking of it, that stuff is the one big truth contained in Christianity: The personal god / the priesthood of all believers. The rest is just fucking confused. Meister Eckhart definitely had something but it’s kinda like Buddha trying to teach while avoiding getting burned at the stake so the conceptual framework is rather impenetrable as everything had to be cast into pre-existing doctrine.

                    seeking favor from by doing X thing(s)(sacrifice of some sort, leave food/drink as offering, slaughtering other gods followers)

                    Symbolic allotting of resources to an instinct, nourishing it, and, erm, pathos. Don’t do the last one that’s mania and gods are perfectly content with you sacrificing some time and mental space, the ritual is for you, not them. In any case if it loses its magic just because you wrap it in a materialist explanation it’s not the real deal, yet you can repeat “I’m doing psychology” as mantra as much as you want when connecting up at that level but it’s still going to feel religious – because that’s the quality of the qualia you see in that area: Magic happens because you didn’t expect things. Otherwise it wouldn’t feel that way, it’s the sound of your mind getting a good knead-through.

    • @madcaesar
      link
      -11 year ago

      An all knowing all powerful God is incompatible with free will.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Those ascriptions are incompatible with logical consistency in general. But a Christian would say: God chooses to not use power.