We think it is, but it would be great if someone with a little more knowledge could post a more authoritative response in that thread.

  • TroyM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41 year ago

    There are many small fossils on that rock. It would be hard to tell what the rock itself is from just the photo. Limestone is the most likely candidate.

    You could test if it is limestone by putting a small drop of very strong acid on it and seeing if it fizzles. Hardware stores sell muriatic acid (scientifically called hydrochloric acid) usually as a pool chemical. One drop from an eye dropper would be enough to tell definitively that it is limestone.

    It would be incredibly difficult to determine the age without conclusively identifying a shell from a specific era. This is known as a bio-marker. A professional paleontologist who specializes in paleostrategraphy might be able to do it – but they trypicallt cost about $200/hr and work for giant oil companies.

    If the sample is very young, like less than 100k years old (yeah, the geologic timescale calls that young), then you might be able to carbon date it. But that’s assuming it is limestone or there is still some carbon remaining in the shell material itself.

    But, yes, fossils. No, dating it is difficult. Unless it is of academic interest, it’ll cost a fortune to date. There are millions of rocks like this, and it is unlikely to be unique, except to you ;)

    • @myklOP
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      Thanks Troy, I’ve linked to this answer on the original post. Best wishes for the growth of this group!