This is what this user posted and embarrassingly deleted before writing the comment above:
grazing lands aren’t croplands
If you can’t even be bothered to read a full quote that was handed to you, you aren’t discussing in good faith. You can go ahead and fuck off with your hand wavy non-scientific bullshit. Learn to read a source and provide a proper rebuttal with evidence instead of spamming nonsense.
this is clearly a bad-faith attempt to avoid the fact that im right: in feeding animals the unwanted parts of our crops, animals actually help conserve water.
that’s not what your source says. and all of agriculture is about 20% of our emissions, but i’d be fine if it were 100%: we need to eat.
Dude, it’s one of the first things written on the first page. Come on now, this is embarassing.
deleted by creator
Jesus Christ, so close, read ten more words. Do you think you can do that buddy?
but not exclusively for livestock feed production. it’s not “dedicated”.
This is what this user posted and embarrassingly deleted before writing the comment above:
If you can’t even be bothered to read a full quote that was handed to you, you aren’t discussing in good faith. You can go ahead and fuck off with your hand wavy non-scientific bullshit. Learn to read a source and provide a proper rebuttal with evidence instead of spamming nonsense.
Edit: Oh look I broke the spambot lol
this is clearly a bad-faith attempt to avoid the fact that im right: in feeding animals the unwanted parts of our crops, animals actually help conserve water.
calling me a spambot doesn’t change whether i’m right, or you’re literate.
🤡
appeal to ridicule
Learn to read a source and provide a proper rebuttal with evidence instead of spamming nonsense.
You can go ahead and fuck off with your hand wavy non-scientific bullshit.