• @tasty4skin
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      can you define quaint? bc it doesn’t seem like your intention lines up with its meaning

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m being facetious. Believers like you complaining about atheists while enjoying a position of privilege are perfect targets for mockery.

        • Sentrovasi
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The person started by saying they were not religious. Feels like you’re just looking to offend some religious people… on an atheist community. Kinda proving their point there bud.

          • @tasty4skin
            link
            English
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            exactly my point. the atheism subreddit used to be exactly like this too. it’s chock full of anti-religious circlejerkers that want nothing but to own believers and it’s just pure brainrot.

            but that’s my problem with the current state of lemmy in general. it seems like there’s a lot of reactionary bullshit and no actual discussion. people will just assume that you believe certain things if you disagree with what they’re saying.

    • @tasty4skin
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      while you’re defining quaint, have a go at defining “content” and make sure it includes fatwas and religious killings, since you consider those to be content.

      or perhaps you’re just circlejerking with the other antitheists here and it doesn’t matter as long as God bad Science good.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        or perhaps you’re just circlejerking with the other antitheists here and it doesn’t matter as long as God bad Science good.

        Maybe. But given that we’re not wrong, I don’t care if you’re offended.