• @soEZ
    link
    131 year ago

    This a really bad take. Seawater deal with RO is a marvel of efficiency, only 2-3 times above the thermodynamic limit of demixing water from salt. It does not really generate toxic waste like coal fired power plants, but does produce lots of brine with various organics (antiscalants, surfactants etc.) that are not that great. The key issue is water is very cheap from traditional sources (surface water and groundwater) and requires rather crude treatment to be usable, resulting in very low cost. Hence why desal is used in areas where they have no choice. If you don’t have surface/ground water source or brackish water source you are doing seawater deal or leave the area…not many choices. At least RO is electrified so it can use renewables but that does not really solve the much higher cost…or issue of brine generation, with zld have a set of it’s own issues costs…

    • @Burn_The_Right
      link
      31 year ago

      Very good to know. Thank you for the updated education.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -11 year ago

      It does not really generate toxic waste like coal fired power plants

      It generates all the waste associated with the electricity it uses, which is often from coal fired power plants…

      • qyron
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Considering the area a desalination plant requires, fitting it with wind and solar would not pose a challenge.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          By the same argument, replacing the coal fired power plant with wind and solar wouldn’t pose a challenge either.

          The point is, you’ve got to compare apples to apples: either coal power vs. desalinization powered by coal, or renewables vs. desalinization powered by renewables. In every case, the pollution produced by the desalinization process (i.e., the brine etc.) is simply added to the pollution produced by whatever means was used to generate the power for it, which means @soEZ’s attempt to compare desalinization to power generation doesn’t make much sense.

          • qyron
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            A coal burning plant has a comparisable smaller base of implantation; deactivating the coal plant to have it replaced by a solar or a wind (if even possible) would hardly output the same energy.

            By comparison, a desalination plant takes a large area, by the shore, where wind and solar are plentiful, so it can be fitted with such energy source from the start.

            The brines can and should be channeled to harvest the salts in it. The salt is raw matter for chemical industry.

            It’s amazing how quick we are to find problems to a promising solution but the moment extracting water from surface or underground sources becomes impossible or unfeaseable we will resort to those solutions.

            • @money_loo
              link
              11 year ago

              No, you’re just clearly too stupid in history and geology to know that when the groundwater runs out, so does tomorrow. /S

              • qyron
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Are we resorting to basic insult, now?

                The situation is dire - for us - but the planet is not going to spontaneously combust with us on the surface.

                sigh

                I am fucking fed up with all the fucking doom and gloom every half shit media outlet burps ou, tailored to stirr panic into everyone and their grandmother.

                Everybody is a genius but nobody really has an answer to actually fucking solve anything. Everybody is acting on a pin’s head trying to discover what is going to happen next and in the meanwhile nobody can be bothered to actually do something proactively to enact change, like perhaps voting!

                Like it or not, at some point, even for preservation purposes, we will source more of our water from the oceans because it will be that or death.

                My country has already transitioned into a fully sustainable power grid, using hydroeletric, solar and wind, and plans to implement more sustainable energy sources is under way. We are also converting a refinery to produce green hydrogen and we’ve already phased out coal, with only a couple of fossil gas plants still in operation. Meanwhile, every sane person is trying their best to make their homes more efficient and even trying to be self reliant on energy, through solar and wind.

                We are facing constant droughts and dry spells and public pressure is being put on the government, regardless of color, to implement desalination plants regardless of cost so we can maintain our country alive.

                I am fed up with everyone spelling doom and gloom left and right but nobody cares to recognize the small things being done now!

                Have nice one and piss off!

                • @money_loo
                  link
                  11 year ago

                  Missing that sarcasm tag didn’t help you at all my dude. And it was so big!

      • @soEZ
        link
        11 year ago

        So does everything else and projected to 2050, we are looking at 40-50% renewable penetration. At least it will leverage those renewables. Other desal plants in saudie literally burn fossils to drive distillation for their deal needs, which far away from thermodynamic limit. RO offers a solution that is efficient and can be ran of renewables if the grid offers that…but it comes at high cost.

        The bigger issue is we need to look at where and how we use water. Much of how and where we use drinking water and irrigation water does not make much sense. California uses 20% of it’s energy to move water around…and that’s primarily because of agg. Why are we doing agg in a desert environment, why do we waste most of our water irregating grass, etc.

        Desalination is really bad alternative to water reuse as well due to simple thermodynamics (dasalting seawater is just energetically expensive relatively to treating secondary effluent with low tds.) but we are too afraid to do direct or indirect reuse even though we drink recycled water… Guess where your drinking water comes from…from river upstream that was drank by extracted by drinking water plant, treated, drank, sent to sewage, treated by waster plant and dumbed back into the river…anyway. End rant…